GSD-2022-29255
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions prior to 0.3.4 when a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address (including side effects) could be evaluated twice. This may result in incorrect outcomes for contracts. This issue has been addressed in v0.3.4.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-29255",
"description": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions prior to 0.3.4 when a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address (including side effects) could be evaluated twice. This may result in incorrect outcomes for contracts. This issue has been addressed in v0.3.4.",
"id": "GSD-2022-29255"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-29255"
],
"details": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions prior to 0.3.4 when a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address (including side effects) could be evaluated twice. This may result in incorrect outcomes for contracts. This issue has been addressed in v0.3.4.",
"id": "GSD-2022-29255",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:42.084276Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-29255",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Multiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyper"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "vyper",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 0.3.4"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "vyperlang"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions prior to 0.3.4 when a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address (including side effects) could be evaluated twice. This may result in incorrect outcomes for contracts. This issue has been addressed in v0.3.4."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/6b4d8ff185de071252feaa1c319712b2d6577f8d",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/6b4d8ff185de071252feaa1c319712b2d6577f8d"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "\u003c0.3.4",
"affected_versions": "All versions before 0.3.4",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-670",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2023-08-02",
"description": "### Impact\nwhen a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address could be evaluated twice. this is usually only an efficiency problem, but if evaluation of the contract address has side effects, it could result in double evaluation of the side effects.\n\nin the following example, `Foo(msg.sender).bar()` is the contract address for the following call (to `.foo()`), and could get evaluated twice\n\n```vyper\ninterface Foo:\n def foo(): nonpayable\n def bar() -\u003e address: nonpayable\n\n@external\ndef do_stuff():\n Foo(Foo(msg.sender).bar()).foo()\n```\n\n### Patches\nv0.3.4\n\n### Workarounds\nassign contract addresses to variables. the above example would change to\n```vyper\n@external\ndef do_stuff():\n t: Foo = Foo(msg.sender).bar()\n t.foo()\n```\n\n### References\n\n### For more information\n",
"fixed_versions": [
"0.3.4"
],
"identifier": "GMS-2022-1912",
"identifiers": [
"CVE-2022-29255",
"GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38",
"GMS-2022-1912"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions starting from 0.3.4",
"package_slug": "pypi/vyper",
"pubdate": "2022-06-09",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 0.3.4 or above.",
"title": "Multiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyper",
"urls": [
"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38",
"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/6b4d8ff185de071252feaa1c319712b2d6577f8d",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38"
],
"uuid": "bec24fda-092b-4813-b8b2-82228ef81445"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "0.3.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-29255"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions prior to 0.3.4 when a calling an external contract with no return value, the contract address (including side effects) could be evaluated twice. This may result in incorrect outcomes for contracts. This issue has been addressed in v0.3.4."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-670"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/6b4d8ff185de071252feaa1c319712b2d6577f8d",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/6b4d8ff185de071252feaa1c319712b2d6577f8d"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-08-02T16:22Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-06-09T09:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.