GSD-2022-24112
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX's data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-24112",
"description": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.",
"id": "GSD-2022-24112",
"references": [
"https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2022-24112"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-24112"
],
"details": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.",
"id": "GSD-2022-24112",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:43.589800Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-24112",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Apache APISIX",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 2.12",
"version_value": "2.12.1"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 2.10",
"version_value": "2.10.4"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003e=",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 1",
"version_value": "1.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Original discovery by Real World CTF at Chaitin Tech. Reported by Sauercloud."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": [
{
"other": "high"
}
],
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-290 Authentication Bypass by Spoofing"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220211 CVE-2022-24112: Apache APISIX: apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/11/3"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "1. explicitly configure the enabled plugins in `conf/config.yaml`, ensure `batch-requests` is disabled. (Or just comment out `batch-requests` in `conf/config-default.yaml`)\nOr\n1. upgrade to 2.10.4 or 2.12.1."
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "2.12.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.11.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "2.10.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-24112"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-290"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220211 CVE-2022-24112: Apache APISIX: apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/11/3"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-05-11T14:58Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-02-11T13:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.