GSD-2021-47214

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2024-04-11 05:05
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error Currently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we bail out using "goto out_release_unlock;" in the cases where idx >= size, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page == false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see restore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following call to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h->resv_hugepages causing a 100% reproducible leak. We should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the pagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is no reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call restore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to page_in_pagecache to make that clear.
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2021-47214"
      ],
      "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error().  In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error().  Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear.",
      "id": "GSD-2021-47214",
      "modified": "2024-04-11T05:05:09.682284Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2021-47214",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Linux",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "c7b1850dfb41",
                          "version_value": "b5069d44e2fb"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "not down converted",
                          "x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
                            "defaultStatus": "affected",
                            "versions": [
                              {
                                "status": "affected",
                                "version": "5.14"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThan": "5.14",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "0",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "5.15.5",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "5.16",
                                "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
                              }
                            ]
                          }
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Linux"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error().  In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error().  Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear."
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-d175d3acf727"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error().  In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error().  Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2021-47214",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-10T19:49:51.183",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-10T19:15:48.680",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.