GSD-2021-43827
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:23Details
discourse-footnote is a library providing footnotes for posts in Discourse. ### Impact When posting an inline footnote wrapped in `<a>` tags (e.g. `<a>^[footnote]</a>`, the resulting rendered HTML would include a nested `<a>`, which is stripped by Nokogiri because it is not valid. This then caused a javascript error on topic pages because we were looking for an `<a>` element inside the footnote reference span and getting its ID, and because it did not exist we got a null reference error in javascript. Users are advised to update to version 0.2. As a workaround editing offending posts from the rails console or the database console for self-hosters, or disabling the plugin in the admin panel can mitigate this issue.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2021-43827",
"description": "discourse-footnote is a library providing footnotes for posts in Discourse. ### Impact When posting an inline footnote wrapped in `\u003ca\u003e` tags (e.g. `\u003ca\u003e^[footnote]\u003c/a\u003e`, the resulting rendered HTML would include a nested `\u003ca\u003e`, which is stripped by Nokogiri because it is not valid. This then caused a javascript error on topic pages because we were looking for an `\u003ca\u003e` element inside the footnote reference span and getting its ID, and because it did not exist we got a null reference error in javascript. Users are advised to update to version 0.2. As a workaround editing offending posts from the rails console or the database console for self-hosters, or disabling the plugin in the admin panel can mitigate this issue.",
"id": "GSD-2021-43827"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-43827"
],
"details": "discourse-footnote is a library providing footnotes for posts in Discourse. ### Impact When posting an inline footnote wrapped in `\u003ca\u003e` tags (e.g. `\u003ca\u003e^[footnote]\u003c/a\u003e`, the resulting rendered HTML would include a nested `\u003ca\u003e`, which is stripped by Nokogiri because it is not valid. This then caused a javascript error on topic pages because we were looking for an `\u003ca\u003e` element inside the footnote reference span and getting its ID, and because it did not exist we got a null reference error in javascript. Users are advised to update to version 0.2. As a workaround editing offending posts from the rails console or the database console for self-hosters, or disabling the plugin in the admin panel can mitigate this issue.",
"id": "GSD-2021-43827",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:26.695093Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-43827",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Inline footnotes wrapped in \u003ca\u003e tags can cause errors in discourse-footnotes"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "discourse-footnote",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 0.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "discourse"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "discourse-footnote is a library providing footnotes for posts in Discourse. ### Impact When posting an inline footnote wrapped in `\u003ca\u003e` tags (e.g. `\u003ca\u003e^[footnote]\u003c/a\u003e`, the resulting rendered HTML would include a nested `\u003ca\u003e`, which is stripped by Nokogiri because it is not valid. This then caused a javascript error on topic pages because we were looking for an `\u003ca\u003e` element inside the footnote reference span and getting its ID, and because it did not exist we got a null reference error in javascript. Users are advised to update to version 0.2. As a workaround editing offending posts from the rails console or the database console for self-hosters, or disabling the plugin in the admin panel can mitigate this issue."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/security/advisories/GHSA-58vr-c56v-qr57",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/security/advisories/GHSA-58vr-c56v-qr57"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/commit/796617e0131277011207541313522cd1946661ab",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/commit/796617e0131277011207541313522cd1946661ab"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-58vr-c56v-qr57",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse_footnote:*:*:*:*:*:discourse:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "0.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-43827"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "discourse-footnote is a library providing footnotes for posts in Discourse. ### Impact When posting an inline footnote wrapped in `\u003ca\u003e` tags (e.g. `\u003ca\u003e^[footnote]\u003c/a\u003e`, the resulting rendered HTML would include a nested `\u003ca\u003e`, which is stripped by Nokogiri because it is not valid. This then caused a javascript error on topic pages because we were looking for an `\u003ca\u003e` element inside the footnote reference span and getting its ID, and because it did not exist we got a null reference error in javascript. Users are advised to update to version 0.2. As a workaround editing offending posts from the rails console or the database console for self-hosters, or disabling the plugin in the admin panel can mitigate this issue."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-755"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/commit/796617e0131277011207541313522cd1946661ab",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/commit/796617e0131277011207541313522cd1946661ab"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/security/advisories/GHSA-58vr-c56v-qr57",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-footnote/security/advisories/GHSA-58vr-c56v-qr57"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2021-12-29T20:31Z",
"publishedDate": "2021-12-14T23:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…