GSD-2021-33001
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:23{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2021-33001",
"description": "xArrow SCADA versions 7.2 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to parameter \u2018bdate\u2019 of the resource xhisvalue.htm, which may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute arbitrary code.",
"id": "GSD-2021-33001"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-33001"
],
"details": "xArrow SCADA versions 7.2 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to parameter \u2018bdate\u2019 of the resource xhisvalue.htm, which may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute arbitrary code.",
"id": "GSD-2021-33001",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:18.622668Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2021-08-17T21:49:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2021-33001",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "xArrow SCADA Cross-site Scripting"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "xArrow SCADA",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "7.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "xArrow"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Sharon Brizinov from Claroty, and Michael Heinzl reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "xArrow SCADA versions 7.2 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to parameter \u2018bdate\u2019 of the resource xhisvalue.htm, which may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute arbitrary code."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-79: Cross-site Scripting"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-229-03",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-229-03"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "xArrow has not responded to requests to work with CISA to mitigate these vulnerabilities. Users of these affected products who would like to see more responsible security are invited to contact xArrow customer support."
},
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Specifically, users should:\n Disable web server implementation. Web server is disabled by default.\n Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure that they are not accessible from the Internet.\n Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls, and isolate them from the business network.\n When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.\n\nCISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures."
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:xarrow:xarrow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "7.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2021-33001"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "xArrow SCADA versions 7.2 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to parameter \u2018bdate\u2019 of the resource xhisvalue.htm, which may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute arbitrary code."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-229-03",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-229-03"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": true
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.7
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-05-25T13:52Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-05-16T18:15Z"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.