GSD-2021-24174

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:23
Details
The Database Backups WordPress plugin through 1.2.2.6 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the database, change the plugin's settings and delete backups.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2021-24174
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2021-24174",
    "description": "The Database Backups WordPress plugin through 1.2.2.6 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the database, change the plugin\u0027s settings and delete backups.",
    "id": "GSD-2021-24174",
    "references": [
      "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2021-24174"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2021-24174"
      ],
      "details": "The Database Backups WordPress plugin through 1.2.2.6 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the database, change the plugin\u0027s settings and delete backups.",
      "id": "GSD-2021-24174",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:37.456148Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2021-24174",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Database Backups \u003c= 1.2.2.6 - CSRF to Backup Download"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Database Backups",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                          "version_name": "1.2.2.6",
                          "version_value": "1.2.2.6"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Unknown"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "credit": [
        {
          "lang": "eng",
          "value": "0xB9"
        }
      ],
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The Database Backups WordPress plugin through 1.2.2.6 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the database, change the plugin\u0027s settings and delete backups."
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/350c3e9a-bcc2-486a-90e6-d1dc13ce1bd5",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/350c3e9a-bcc2-486a-90e6-d1dc13ce1bd5"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163091/WordPress-Database-Backups-1.2.2.6-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163091/WordPress-Database-Backups-1.2.2.6-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:database-backups_project:database-backups:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "1.2.2.6",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-24174"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The Database Backups WordPress plugin through 1.2.2.6 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the database, change the plugin\u0027s settings and delete backups."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-352"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/350c3e9a-bcc2-486a-90e6-d1dc13ce1bd5",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/350c3e9a-bcc2-486a-90e6-d1dc13ce1bd5"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163091/WordPress-Database-Backups-1.2.2.6-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163091/WordPress-Database-Backups-1.2.2.6-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.8,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 4.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 5.2
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2021-12-03T18:31Z",
      "publishedDate": "2021-04-05T19:15Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.