GSD-2020-7670
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2020-10-20 00:00Details
agoo through 2.12.3 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used
as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct
HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore,
invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be
leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2020-7670",
"description": "agoo prior to 2.14.0 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks where `agoo` is used as part of a chain of backend servers due to insufficient `Content-Length` and `Transfer Encoding` parsing.",
"id": "GSD-2020-7670"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "agoo",
"purl": "pkg:gem/agoo"
}
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-7670",
"GHSA-h385-52j6-9984"
],
"details": "agoo through 2.12.3 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used\nas a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct\nHTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore,\ninvalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be\nleveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.\n",
"id": "GSD-2020-7670",
"modified": "2020-10-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"published": "2020-10-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": 7.5,
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "HTTP Request Smuggling in Agoo"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "report@snyk.io",
"ID": "CVE-2020-7670",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "agoo",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "versions prior to 2.14.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "agoo prior to 2.14.0 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks where `agoo` is used as part of a chain of backend servers due to insufficient `Content-Length` and `Transfer Encoding` parsing."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "HTTP Request Smuggling"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-AGOO-569137",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-AGOO-569137"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130"
}
]
}
},
"github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db": {
"cve": "2020-7670",
"cvss_v3": 7.5,
"date": "2020-10-20",
"description": "agoo through 2.12.3 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used\nas a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct\nHTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore,\ninvalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be\nleveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.\n",
"gem": "agoo",
"ghsa": "h385-52j6-9984",
"patched_versions": [
"\u003e= 2.13.0"
],
"related": {
"url": [
"https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130"
]
},
"title": "HTTP Request Smuggling in Agoo",
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88"
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "\u003c=2.12.3",
"affected_versions": "All versions up to 2.12.3",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-444",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2020-11-17",
"description": "agoo allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend with a frontend proxy that is also vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the `Content-Length` header twice. Furthermore, invalid `Transfer-Encoding` headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.",
"fixed_versions": [
"2.13.0"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2020-7670",
"identifiers": [
"CVE-2020-7670"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions after 2.12.3",
"package_slug": "gem/agoo",
"pubdate": "2020-06-10",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 2.13.0 or above.",
"title": "Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (HTTP Request Smuggling)",
"urls": [
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7670"
],
"uuid": "f8dff70f-1a15-4d6d-95dc-c53ee2b89c11"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ohler:agoo:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "2.12.3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "report@snyk.io",
"ID": "CVE-2020-7670"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "agoo prior to 2.14.0 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks where `agoo` is used as part of a chain of backend servers due to insufficient `Content-Length` and `Transfer Encoding` parsing."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-AGOO-569137",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-AGOO-569137"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/issues/88"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://github.com/ohler55/agoo/commit/23d03535cf7b50d679a60a953a0cae9519a4a130"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2020-11-17T00:15Z",
"publishedDate": "2020-06-10T16:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.