GSD-2020-12658

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
** DISPUTED ** gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states "We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn't make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem."
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-12658",
    "description": "** DISPUTED ** gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states \"We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn\u0027t make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem.\"",
    "id": "GSD-2020-12658",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-12658.html",
      "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2020-12658.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-12658"
      ],
      "details": "** DISPUTED ** gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states \"We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn\u0027t make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem.\"",
      "id": "GSD-2020-12658",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:49.328737Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-12658",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "** DISPUTED ** gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states \"We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn\u0027t make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem.\""
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003"
          },
          {
            "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20210104 [SECURITY] [DLA 2516-1] gssproxy security update",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00004.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gssproxy_project:gssproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "49B6C938-D1D0-4618-B7DD-BFF581135BE5",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "0.8.3",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states \"We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn\u0027t make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** gssproxy (tambi\u00e9n se conoce como gss-proxy) versiones anteriores a 0.8.3 no desbloquea cond_mutex antes de la salida de pthread en la funci\u00f3n gp_worker_main() en el archivo gp_workers.c. NOTA: Un comentario de la corriente ascendente dice: \"Ya estamos en una ruta de apagado al ejecutar el c\u00f3digo en cuesti\u00f3n, por lo que un DoS all\u00ed no tiene ning\u00fan sentido, y no se nos ha proporcionado informaci\u00f3n adicional (como corriente ascendente) para indicar por qu\u00e9 esto ser\u00eda un problema\"."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2020-12658",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-11T01:06:50.993",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
              "impactScore": 6.4,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 9.8,
                "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2020-12-31T01:15:12.553",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Mailing List",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00004.html"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-667"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…