GSD-2020-12526
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2020-12526",
"description": "TwinCAT OPC UA Server in versions up to 2.3.0.12 and IPC Diagnostics UA Server in versions up to 3.1.0.1 from Beckhoff Automation GmbH \u0026 Co. KG are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The attacker needs to send several specifically crafted requests to the running OPC UA server. After some of these requests the OPC UA server is no longer responsive to any client. This is without effect to the real-time functionality of IPCs.",
"id": "GSD-2020-12526"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-12526"
],
"details": "TwinCAT OPC UA Server in versions up to 2.3.0.12 and IPC Diagnostics UA Server in versions up to 3.1.0.1 from Beckhoff Automation GmbH \u0026 Co. KG are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The attacker needs to send several specifically crafted requests to the running OPC UA server. After some of these requests the OPC UA server is no longer responsive to any client. This is without effect to the real-time functionality of IPCs.",
"id": "GSD-2020-12526",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:49.586199Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "info@cert.vde.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2021-04-27T10:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2020-12526",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "BECKHOFF: DoS-Vulnerability for TwinCAT OPC UA Server and IPC Diagnostics UA Server"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "TwinCAT OPC UA Server",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "2.3.0.12"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "IPC Diagnostics UA Server",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "3.1.0.1"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "TF6100",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "3.3.18"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Beckhoff"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Beckhoff Automation thanks Industrial Control Security Laboratory of QI-ANXIN Technology Group Inc. from China for reporting the issue and for support and efforts with the coordinated disclosure. Also Beckhoff Automation thanks CERT@VDE for coordination."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "TwinCAT OPC UA Server in versions up to 2.3.0.12 and IPC Diagnostics UA Server in versions up to 3.1.0.1 from Beckhoff Automation GmbH \u0026 Co. KG are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The attacker needs to send several specifically crafted requests to the running OPC UA server. After some of these requests the OPC UA server is no longer responsive to any client. This is without effect to the real-time functionality of IPCs."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://cert.vde.com/en-us/advisories/vde-2020-051",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://cert.vde.com/en-us/advisories/vde-2020-051"
},
{
"name": "https://download.beckhoff.com/download/Document/product-security/Advisories/advisory-2021-001.pdf",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://download.beckhoff.com/download/Document/product-security/Advisories/advisory-2021-001.pdf"
}
]
},
"solution": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "For devices running Windows but not Windows CE or TwinCAT/BSD please get a recent version of the OPC UA servers through the conventional ways and update your system.\nFor devices running Windows CE please request a recent image via Beckhoff\u2019s support and apply it to your device.\nFor the product CX8091 please use firmware version \"CX8091_CE600_LF_v356f_TC211R3_B2306_v2\" or later.\nPlease note that the updated OPC UA server leaves less RAM available to your application on the CX8091."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "VDE-2020-051",
"defect": [
"VDE-2020-051"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Consider disabling the IPC Diagnostics Server by stopping and disabling the corresponding Windows service or service. For example this can be achieved with the following PowerShell commands:\n\nStop-Service -Force -Name DevMgrSvr-UA\nSet-Service -Name DevMgrSvr-UA -StartupType Disabled\n\nAlternatively consider limiting access to the TCP port the OPC UA server is listening on. This can happen with a dedicated firewall appliance which sits in front of an affected device. Alternatively at the device the Windows firewall can be configured to limit access to the TCP port."
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:beckhoff:ipc_diagnostics_ua_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "3.1.0.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:beckhoff:tf6100:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "3.3.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:beckhoff:twincat_opc_ua_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "2.3.0.12",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "info@cert.vde.com",
"ID": "CVE-2020-12526"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "TwinCAT OPC UA Server in versions up to 2.3.0.12 and IPC Diagnostics UA Server in versions up to 3.1.0.1 from Beckhoff Automation GmbH \u0026 Co. KG are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The attacker needs to send several specifically crafted requests to the running OPC UA server. After some of these requests the OPC UA server is no longer responsive to any client. This is without effect to the real-time functionality of IPCs."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://download.beckhoff.com/download/Document/product-security/Advisories/advisory-2021-001.pdf",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://download.beckhoff.com/download/Document/product-security/Advisories/advisory-2021-001.pdf"
},
{
"name": "https://cert.vde.com/en-us/advisories/vde-2020-051",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.vde.com/en-us/advisories/vde-2020-051"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2021-05-25T15:02Z",
"publishedDate": "2021-05-13T14:15Z"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.