GSD-2017-11706

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
The Boozt Fashion application before 2.3.4 for Android allows remote attackers to read login credentials by sniffing the network and leveraging the lack of SSL. NOTE: the vendor response, before the application was changed to enable SSL logins, was "At the moment that is an accepted risk. We only have https on the checkout part of the site."
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2017-11706
To clipboard Create KEV Entry 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2017-11706",
    "description": "The Boozt Fashion application before 2.3.4 for Android allows remote attackers to read login credentials by sniffing the network and leveraging the lack of SSL. NOTE: the vendor response, before the application was changed to enable SSL logins, was \"At the moment that is an accepted risk. We only have https on the checkout part of the site.\"",
    "id": "GSD-2017-11706"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2017-11706"
      ],
      "details": "The Boozt Fashion application before 2.3.4 for Android allows remote attackers to read login credentials by sniffing the network and leveraging the lack of SSL. NOTE: the vendor response, before the application was changed to enable SSL logins, was \"At the moment that is an accepted risk. We only have https on the checkout part of the site.\"",
      "id": "GSD-2017-11706",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:15.205218Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2017-11706",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The Boozt Fashion application before 2.3.4 for Android allows remote attackers to read login credentials by sniffing the network and leveraging the lack of SSL. NOTE: the vendor response, before the application was changed to enable SSL logins, was \"At the moment that is an accepted risk. We only have https on the checkout part of the site.\""
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2017/07/27/boozt-fashion-android-app-didnt-use-ssl-for-login-cve-2017-11706/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2017/07/27/boozt-fashion-android-app-didnt-use-ssl-for-login-cve-2017-11706/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/166712",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/166712"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:boozt:boozt:*:*:*:*:*:android:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "2.3.3",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-11706"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The Boozt Fashion application before 2.3.4 for Android allows remote attackers to read login credentials by sniffing the network and leveraging the lack of SSL. NOTE: the vendor response, before the application was changed to enable SSL logins, was \"At the moment that is an accepted risk. We only have https on the checkout part of the site.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-200"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2017/07/27/boozt-fashion-android-app-didnt-use-ssl-for-login-cve-2017-11706/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2017/07/27/boozt-fashion-android-app-didnt-use-ssl-for-login-cve-2017-11706/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/166712",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/166712"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2017-08-15T17:43Z",
      "publishedDate": "2017-07-28T05:29Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.