GSD-2016-7074

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2016-7074",
    "description": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature.",
    "id": "GSD-2016-7074",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7074.html",
      "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764",
      "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2016-7074.html",
      "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2016-7074"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2016-7074"
      ],
      "details": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature.",
      "id": "GSD-2016-7074",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:20.938572Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2016-7074",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "pdns",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "3.4.11"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "4.0.2"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "4.0.4"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Open-Xchange"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": [
          [
            {
              "vectorString": "5.3/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.0"
            }
          ]
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-20"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-3764",
            "refsource": "DEBIAN",
            "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:authoritative:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "4.0.2",
                "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:authoritative:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.4.11",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "4.0.4",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-7074"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-20"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Issue Tracking",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-3764",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:19Z",
      "publishedDate": "2018-09-11T13:29Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…