GSD-2013-3399

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
Buffer overflow in an unspecified Android API on the Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX650 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that leverage incorrect memory allocation, aka Bug IDs CSCuf93957, CSCug22352, and CSCug22462.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2013-3399",
    "description": "Buffer overflow in an unspecified Android API on the Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX650 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that leverage incorrect memory allocation, aka Bug IDs CSCuf93957, CSCug22352, and CSCug22462.",
    "id": "GSD-2013-3399"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2013-3399"
      ],
      "details": "Buffer overflow in an unspecified Android API on the Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX650 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that leverage incorrect memory allocation, aka Bug IDs CSCuf93957, CSCug22352, and CSCug22462.",
      "id": "GSD-2013-3399",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:22.777249Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2013-3399",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Buffer overflow in an unspecified Android API on the Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX650 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that leverage incorrect memory allocation, aka Bug IDs CSCuf93957, CSCug22352, and CSCug22462."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "20130629 Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX600 Series Potential Code Injection Vulnerability",
            "refsource": "CISCO",
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3399"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:desktop_collaboration_experience:dx650:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2013-3399"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Buffer overflow in an unspecified Android API on the Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX650 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that leverage incorrect memory allocation, aka Bug IDs CSCuf93957, CSCug22352, and CSCug22462."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-119"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20130629 Cisco Desktop Collaboration Experience DX600 Series Potential Code Injection Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3399"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "SINGLE",
            "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
            "baseScore": 6.6,
            "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
            "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.7,
          "impactScore": 10.0,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2013-07-23T09:55Z",
      "publishedDate": "2013-07-02T03:43Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…