GSD-2012-2768

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the topic administration page in the RTFM extension 2.0.4 through 2.4.3 for Best Practical Solutions RT allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2012-2768",
    "description": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the topic administration page in the RTFM extension 2.0.4 through 2.4.3 for Best Practical Solutions RT allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.",
    "id": "GSD-2012-2768",
    "references": [
      "https://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2535"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2012-2768"
      ],
      "details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the topic administration page in the RTFM extension 2.0.4 through 2.4.3 for Best Practical Solutions RT allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.",
      "id": "GSD-2012-2768",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:16.024763Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2012-2768",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the topic administration page in the RTFM extension 2.0.4 through 2.4.3 for Best Practical Solutions RT allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "54689",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/54689"
          },
          {
            "name": "50440",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50440"
          },
          {
            "name": "50024",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50024"
          },
          {
            "name": "rtfm-unspec-xss(77212)",
            "refsource": "XF",
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77212"
          },
          {
            "name": "[rt-announce] 20120725 Security vulnerabilities in three commonly deployed RT extensions",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-July/000208.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:best_practical_solutions:request_tracker:2.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-2768"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the topic administration page in the RTFM extension 2.0.4 through 2.4.3 for Best Practical Solutions RT allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-79"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "54689",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/54689"
            },
            {
              "name": "50024",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50024"
            },
            {
              "name": "[rt-announce] 20120725 Security vulnerabilities in three commonly deployed RT extensions",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-July/000208.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "50440",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50440"
            },
            {
              "name": "rtfm-unspec-xss(77212)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77212"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2017-08-29T01:31Z",
      "publishedDate": "2012-08-15T21:55Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…