GSD-2012-1620

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2012-1620
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2012-1620",
    "description": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.",
    "id": "GSD-2012-1620"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2012-1620"
      ],
      "details": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.",
      "id": "GSD-2012-1620",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:17.720780Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2012-1620",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "=",
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:suckless:slock:0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-1620"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-264"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "48700",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit"
              ],
              "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 Re: CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "81035",
              "refsource": "OSVDB",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Patch"
              ],
              "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310"
            },
            {
              "name": "52922",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922"
            },
            {
              "name": "slock-xraisewindow-sec-bypass(74666)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 3.6,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 4.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "LOW",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2017-08-29T01:31Z",
      "publishedDate": "2012-07-12T19:55Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.