GSD-2010-3492

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2010-3492",
    "description": "The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections.",
    "id": "GSD-2010-3492",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-3492.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2010-3492"
      ],
      "details": "The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections.",
      "id": "GSD-2010-3492",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:33.789462Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2010-3492",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100910 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/11/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://bugs.python.org/issue6706",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "http://bugs.python.org/issue6706"
          },
          {
            "name": "MDVSA-2010:216",
            "refsource": "MANDRIVA",
            "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:216"
          },
          {
            "name": "oval:org.mitre.oval:def:12111",
            "refsource": "OVAL",
            "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12111"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100924 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100922 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/22/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100909 CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/09/6"
          },
          {
            "name": "MDVSA-2010:215",
            "refsource": "MANDRIVA",
            "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:215"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:python:python:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "2.7",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:python:python:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.1.2",
                "versionStartIncluding": "3.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2010-3492"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100924 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100910 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/11/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100909 CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/09/6"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100922 Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken =\u003e more subcases",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/22/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://bugs.python.org/issue6706",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://bugs.python.org/issue6706"
            },
            {
              "name": "MDVSA-2010:216",
              "refsource": "MANDRIVA",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:216"
            },
            {
              "name": "MDVSA-2010:215",
              "refsource": "MANDRIVA",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:215"
            },
            {
              "name": "oval:org.mitre.oval:def:12111",
              "refsource": "OVAL",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12111"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-29T00:56Z",
      "publishedDate": "2010-10-19T20:00Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…