GSD-2010-2532
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
** DISPUTED ** lxsession-logout in lxsession in LXDE, as used on SUSE openSUSE 11.3 and other platforms, does not lock the screen when the Suspend or Hibernate button is pressed, which might make it easier for physically proximate attackers to access an unattended laptop via a resume action. NOTE: there is no general agreement that this is a vulnerability, because separate control over locking can be an equally secure, or more secure, behavior in some threat environments.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2010-2532",
"description": "** DISPUTED ** lxsession-logout in lxsession in LXDE, as used on SUSE openSUSE 11.3 and other platforms, does not lock the screen when the Suspend or Hibernate button is pressed, which might make it easier for physically proximate attackers to access an unattended laptop via a resume action. NOTE: there is no general agreement that this is a vulnerability, because separate control over locking can be an equally secure, or more secure, behavior in some threat environments.",
"id": "GSD-2010-2532",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-2532.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2532"
],
"details": "** DISPUTED ** lxsession-logout in lxsession in LXDE, as used on SUSE openSUSE 11.3 and other platforms, does not lock the screen when the Suspend or Hibernate button is pressed, which might make it easier for physically proximate attackers to access an unattended laptop via a resume action. NOTE: there is no general agreement that this is a vulnerability, because separate control over locking can be an equally secure, or more secure, behavior in some threat environments.",
"id": "GSD-2010-2532",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:31.873755Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2010-2532",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "** DISPUTED ** lxsession-logout in lxsession in LXDE, as used on SUSE openSUSE 11.3 and other platforms, does not lock the screen when the Suspend or Hibernate button is pressed, which might make it easier for physically proximate attackers to access an unattended laptop via a resume action. NOTE: there is no general agreement that this is a vulnerability, because separate control over locking can be an equally secure, or more secure, behavior in some threat environments."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20100715 CVE request: lxsession-logout",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/15/1"
},
{
"name": "SUSE-SR:2010:014",
"refsource": "SUSE",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20100715 Re: CVE request: lxsession-logout",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/16/4"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614608",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614608"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622083",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622083"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzillafiles.novell.org/attachment.cgi?id=375737",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzillafiles.novell.org/attachment.cgi?id=375737"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse:11.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5646FDE9-CF21-46A9-B89D-F5BBDB4249AF",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "lxsession-logout in lxsession in LXDE, as used on SUSE openSUSE 11.3 and other platforms, does not lock the screen when the Suspend or Hibernate button is pressed, which might make it easier for physically proximate attackers to access an unattended laptop via a resume action. NOTE: there is no general agreement that this is a vulnerability, because separate control over locking can be an equally secure, or more secure, behavior in some threat environments."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** DISCUTIDO** lxsession-logout en lxsession en LXDE, como el usado en SUSE openSUSE v11.3 y otras plataformas, no bloquea la pantalla cuando se aprieta el bot\u00f3n suspensi\u00f3n o hibernaci\u00f3n, lo que puede hacer que atacantes de proximidad f\u00edsica f\u00e1cilmente accedan al laptop a trav\u00e9s de una acci\u00f3n resume. NOTA: no hay acuerdo general de que esto es una vulnerabilidad, porque el control sobre el bloqueo puede ser igual de seguro, o m\u00e1s seguro, en algunos entornos amenazados."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2010-2532",
"lastModified": "2024-04-11T00:46:52.560",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2010-09-03T20:00:03.763",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/15/1"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/16/4"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622083"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614608"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzillafiles.novell.org/attachment.cgi?id=375737"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-264"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…