GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-XXR9-W8RG-G2H6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-15 06:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix hugetlb self-deadlock in pagemap_scan_pte_hole()

A PAGEMAP_SCAN ioctl requesting PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING on a hugetlb VMA hangs the calling thread, unkillably, as soon as the scan reaches an unpopulated part of the range:

do_pagemap_scan() walk_page_range() walk_hugetlb_range() hugetlb_vma_lock_read() # take the vma lock for read ... pagemap_scan_pte_hole() # ... ->pte_hole() for a hole uffd_wp_range() change_protection() hugetlb_change_protection() hugetlb_vma_lock_write() # ... and block taking it for write

walk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb vma lock for read across the whole walk. A present entry goes to ->hugetlb_entry(); an unpopulated one goes to ->pte_hole(), i.e. pagemap_scan_pte_hole(). To write-protect the hole that handler calls uffd_wp_range(), which on a hugetlb VMA reaches hugetlb_change_protection() and takes the same vma lock for write. The thread then blocks in down_write() waiting for the read lock it is itself holding.

The populated path avoids this: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry() write-protects the entry inline under the page-table lock and never enters hugetlb_change_protection().

Do the same for holes. Fault in the page table and install the uffd-wp marker directly with make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() under the page-table lock, rather than routing through uffd_wp_range(). That is the same sequence hugetlb_change_protection() runs for an unpopulated entry, minus the vma write lock -- which is safe to skip because PMD sharing is disabled on uffd-wp VMAs (hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds() runs at registration), leaving nothing for that lock to serialise against.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72174"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:35Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/proc/task_mmu: fix hugetlb self-deadlock in pagemap_scan_pte_hole()\n\nA PAGEMAP_SCAN ioctl requesting PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING on a hugetlb VMA hangs\nthe calling thread, unkillably, as soon as the scan reaches an unpopulated\npart of the range:\n\n  do_pagemap_scan()\n    walk_page_range()\n      walk_hugetlb_range()\n        hugetlb_vma_lock_read()           # take the vma lock for read ...\n        pagemap_scan_pte_hole()           # ... -\u003epte_hole() for a hole\n          uffd_wp_range()\n            change_protection()\n              hugetlb_change_protection()\n                hugetlb_vma_lock_write()  # ... and block taking it for write\n\nwalk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb vma lock for read across the whole\nwalk.  A present entry goes to -\u003ehugetlb_entry(); an unpopulated one goes\nto -\u003epte_hole(), i.e.  pagemap_scan_pte_hole().  To write-protect the hole\nthat handler calls uffd_wp_range(), which on a hugetlb VMA reaches\nhugetlb_change_protection() and takes the same vma lock for write.  The\nthread then blocks in down_write() waiting for the read lock it is itself\nholding.\n\nThe populated path avoids this: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry()\nwrite-protects the entry inline under the page-table lock and never enters\nhugetlb_change_protection().\n\nDo the same for holes.  Fault in the page table and install the uffd-wp\nmarker directly with make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() under the page-table lock,\nrather than routing through uffd_wp_range().  That is the same sequence\nhugetlb_change_protection() runs for an unpopulated entry, minus the vma\nwrite lock -- which is safe to skip because PMD sharing is disabled on\nuffd-wp VMAs (hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds() runs at registration), leaving\nnothing for that lock to serialise against.",
  "id": "GHSA-xxr9-w8rg-g2h6",
  "modified": "2026-08-15T06:32:14Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18b8a9700610299819d21fd0ea85d24726d17f65"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43b987ed35be9be21a303d1036d4241fec9943df"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ac03652d9edc30c2912037ac83beb42cc67f8e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e92d92bbafb264dc0518d52b846a3c07ed8d523f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…