GHSA-XRJH-RFCR-RXJ7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-09-24 06:31
VLAI
Details

A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The setting that formats the log message emitted for API 4XX errors is an administrator-controlled Python format-string template that is rendered with a live user object as an argument. Because Python string formatting permits attribute and item traversal on its arguments, an administrator can craft a template that walks from the user object into the application settings and reads the Django secret key and the database password. The formatted message is written to a logger that can be forwarded to an external log aggregator, whose destination is also administrator-controlled, allowing the secrets to be sent off the host. An authenticated administrator can thereby obtain the master encryption key used to protect all stored credentials and the database service password, enabling offline decryption of every stored credential, forgery of user sessions, and direct access to the controller database.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-84691"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-134"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-23T20:17:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform\u0027s automation-\ncontroller. The setting that formats the log message emitted for API 4XX errors\nis an administrator-controlled Python format-string template that is rendered\nwith a live user object as an argument. Because Python string formatting permits\nattribute and item traversal on its arguments, an administrator can craft a\ntemplate that walks from the user object into the application settings and reads\nthe Django secret key and the database password. The formatted message is written\nto a logger that can be forwarded to an external log aggregator, whose destination\nis also administrator-controlled, allowing the secrets to be sent off the host. An\nauthenticated administrator can thereby obtain the master encryption key used to\nprotect all stored credentials and the database service password, enabling offline\ndecryption of every stored credential, forgery of user sessions, and direct\naccess to the controller database.",
  "id": "GHSA-xrjh-rfcr-rxj7",
  "modified": "2026-09-24T06:31:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-23T21:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84691"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84691"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2527151"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…