GHSA-XR65-5CPM-G36X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 20:45 – Updated: 2026-07-01 20:45Impact
A vulnerability in Fleet for Rancher Manager affects multi-tenancy environments where different tenants share the same downstream clusters (e.g., different privileged or untrusted teams inside the same organization).
On unpatched versions, tenants could bypass restrictions to access any config map or secret across all namespaces on the downstream cluster. They can create cluster-wide resources using HelmOp or Bundle without authorization.
Specifically, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability in the following ways:
1. Use valuesFrom in fleet.yaml(through a GitRepo resource) or a HelmOp resource to read the contents of any secret an on the downstream cluster, provided they know or can guess the name, namespace, and key.
2. DeployHelmOpandBundle` resources without being restricted to a specific service account for the Fleet agent.
If you use Fleet in a multi-tenant environment, it's recommended that you: - Review your cluster and Fleet deployments logs for indicators of unauthorized access across tenant namespaces. - Rotate any service accounts and credentials that might have been exposed.
Please consult the associated MITRE ATT&CK - Technique - Unsecured Credentials for further information about this category of attack.
Patches
To resolve this vulnerability, upgrade to a patched version of Fleet. The new Policy resource allows you to:
- Configure GitRepos, HelmOps, and Bundles to require a specific service account for the Fleet agent on downstream clusters used for deployment. The agent uses these designated service accounts for operations, blocking access to unauthorized resources.
- Restrict HelmOp repository and chart URLs by using a regular expression. The regular expression is automatically anchored with ^ and $, meaning it must match the entire URL string.
Like GitRepoRestriction, a Policy resource must be created in the specific namespace you want to restrict, and it only applies to that namespace.
Note: Before applying a policy, ensure that the required service account is available on the downstream clusters and is configured with least-privilege permissions.
Patched versions of Fleet include releases v0.15.2, v0.14.6, 0.13.11, and v0.12.15.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade to a fixed version, please make sure that tenants do not have shared access to the same downstream clusters.
Credits
This security issue was reported by the following collaborators according to our responsible disclosure policy:
- Radisauskas Arnoldas from NATO and the NATO Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).
References
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: - Reach out to the SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries. - Open an issue in the Rancher repository. - Verify with our support matrix and product support lifecycle.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.15.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.15.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.14.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.14.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.13.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.13.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.12.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.12.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44935"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-01T20:45:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Impact\nA vulnerability in Fleet for Rancher Manager affects multi-tenancy environments where different tenants share the same downstream clusters (e.g., different privileged or untrusted teams inside the same organization). \n\nOn unpatched versions, tenants could bypass restrictions to access any config map or secret across all namespaces on the downstream cluster. They can create cluster-wide resources using `HelmOp` or `Bundle` without authorization.\nSpecifically, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability in the following ways:\n1. Use `valuesFrom` in `fleet.yaml`(through a `GitRepo` resource) or a `HelmOp resource to read the contents of any secret an on the downstream cluster, provided they know or can guess the name, namespace, and key.\n2. Deploy `HelmOp` and `Bundle` resources without being restricted to a specific service account for the Fleet agent.\n\nIf you use Fleet in a multi-tenant environment, it\u0027s recommended that you:\n- Review your cluster and Fleet deployments logs for indicators of unauthorized access across tenant namespaces.\n- Rotate any service accounts and credentials that might have been exposed.\n\nPlease consult the associated [MITRE ATT\u0026CK - Technique - Unsecured Credentials](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552/) for further information about this category of attack.\n\n### Patches\nTo resolve this vulnerability, upgrade to a patched version of Fleet. The new Policy resource allows you to:\n- Configure `GitRepos`, `HelmOps`, and `Bundles` to require a specific service account for the Fleet agent on downstream clusters used for deployment. The agent uses these designated service accounts for operations, blocking access to unauthorized resources.\n- Restrict `HelmOp` repository and chart URLs by using a regular expression. The regular expression is automatically anchored with `^` and `$`, meaning it must match the entire URL string.\n\nLike `GitRepoRestriction`, a Policy resource must be created in the specific namespace you want to restrict, and it only applies to that namespace.\n\n**Note:** Before applying a policy, ensure that the required service account is available on the downstream clusters and is configured with least-privilege permissions.\n\nPatched versions of Fleet include releases `v0.15.2`, `v0.14.6`, `0.13.11`, and `v0.12.15`.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf you can\u0027t upgrade to a fixed version, please make sure that tenants do not have shared access to the same downstream clusters.\n\n### Credits\n\nThis security issue was reported by the following collaborators according to our responsible disclosure policy:\n\n- Radisauskas Arnoldas from NATO and the NATO Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).\n\n### References\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n- Reach out to the [SUSE Rancher Security team](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/policy) for security related inquiries.\n- Open an issue in the [Rancher](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/issues/new/choose) repository.\n- Verify with our [support matrix](https://www.suse.com/suse-rancher/support-matrix/all-supported-versions/) and [product support lifecycle](https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/).",
"id": "GHSA-xr65-5cpm-g36x",
"modified": "2026-07-01T20:45:39Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T20:45:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/security/advisories/GHSA-xr65-5cpm-g36x"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Rancher Fleet vulnerable to cross namespace secret disclosure via unvalidated `valuesFrom` references in Helm Deployer"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.