GHSA-XQQC-C5GW-C5R5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-14 21:35 – Updated: 2022-12-14 21:35
VLAI
Summary
Tendermint light client verification not taking into account chain ID
Details
Impact
Anyone using the tendermint-light-client and related packages to perform light client verification (e.g. IBC-rs, Hermes).
At present, the light client does not check that the chain IDs of the trusted and untrusted headers match, resulting in a possible attack vector where someone who finds a header from an untrusted chain that satisfies all other verification conditions (e.g. enough overlapping validator signatures) could fool a light client.
The attack vector is currently theoretical, and no proof-of-concept exists yet to exploit it on live networks.
Patches
Users of the light client-related crates can currently upgrade to v0.28.0.
Workarounds
None
References
Severity
5.4 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.27.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "tendermint-light-client-verifier"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.28.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.27.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "tendermint-light-client"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.28.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.27.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "tendermint-light-client-js"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.28.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23507"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-14T21:35:24Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-15T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAnyone using the `tendermint-light-client` and related packages to perform light client verification (e.g. IBC-rs, Hermes).\n\nAt present, the light client does not check that the chain IDs of the trusted and untrusted headers match, resulting in a possible attack vector where someone who finds a header from an untrusted chain that satisfies all other verification conditions (e.g. enough overlapping validator signatures) could fool a light client.\n\nThe attack vector is currently theoretical, and no proof-of-concept exists yet to exploit it on live networks.\n\n### Patches\n\nUsers of the light client-related crates can currently upgrade to `v0.28.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone\n\n### References\n\n- [Light Client specification](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/tree/main/spec/light-client)",
"id": "GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5",
"modified": "2022-12-14T21:35:24Z",
"published": "2022-12-14T21:35:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/informalsystems/tendermint-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/informalsystems/tendermint-rs/commit/5c32f31b97ac3172775699fe0d4ba6003ca4fb18"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/informalsystems/tendermint-rs"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Tendermint light client verification not taking into account chain ID"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…