GHSA-XMVF-MPJX-5XVJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:02 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:02
VLAI?
Details
TrevorC2 v1.1/v1.2 fails to prevent fingerprinting primarily via a discrepancy between response headers when responding to different HTTP methods, also via predictible responses when accessing and interacting with the "SITE_PATH_QUERY".
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-18850"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-04T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "TrevorC2 v1.1/v1.2 fails to prevent fingerprinting primarily via a discrepancy between response headers when responding to different HTTP methods, also via predictible responses when accessing and interacting with the \"SITE_PATH_QUERY\".",
"id": "GHSA-xmvf-mpjx-5xvj",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:02:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:02:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18850"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trustedsec/trevorc2/issues/18"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trustedsec/trevorc2/blob/master/CHANGELOG.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…