GHSA-XMQ9-MFWM-HG4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-31 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-31 21:31WP Photo Album Plus is vulnerable to stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 9.2.03.001 through a decode-after-sanitize (double-encoding) flaw in the photo-comment pipeline. On write, wppa_do_comment() sanitizes the comment with wppa_filter_html() (wp_kses) followed by wp_strip_all_tags() (wppa-functions.php:2623-2624). Because wp_strip_all_tags() only removes real tags, an attacker who submits a double HTML-entity-encoded payload (e.g. &lt;img src=... onload=...&gt;) passes the write filters as harmless entity text and is stored one decode-level down (<img ... onload=...>).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-14922"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-31T07:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "WP Photo Album Plus is vulnerable to stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 9.2.03.001 through a decode-after-sanitize (double-encoding) flaw in the photo-comment pipeline. On write, `wppa_do_comment()` sanitizes the comment with `wppa_filter_html()` (wp_kses) followed by `wp_strip_all_tags()` (`wppa-functions.php:2623-2624`). Because `wp_strip_all_tags()` only removes *real* tags, an attacker who submits a **double HTML-entity-encoded** payload (e.g. `\u0026amp;lt;img src=... onload=...\u0026amp;gt;`) passes the write filters as harmless entity text and is stored one decode-level down (`\u0026lt;img ... onload=...\u0026gt;`).",
"id": "GHSA-xmq9-mfwm-hg4m",
"modified": "2026-07-31T21:31:53Z",
"published": "2026-07-31T09:31:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14922"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/ca9f99eb-221a-417e-b18f-0a8b8b513f2e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.