GHSA-XMP3-76FC-6JHM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-11 00:00
VLAI?
Details
In Ifme, versions 1.0.0 to v.7.33.2 don’t properly invalidate a user’s session even after the user initiated logout. It makes it possible for an attacker to reuse the admin cookies either via local/network access or by other hypothetical attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-25992"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-613"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-10T10:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In Ifme, versions 1.0.0 to v.7.33.2 don\u2019t properly invalidate a user\u2019s session even after the user initiated logout. It makes it possible for an attacker to reuse the admin cookies either via local/network access or by other hypothetical attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-xmp3-76fc-6jhm",
"modified": "2022-02-11T00:00:46Z",
"published": "2022-02-11T00:00:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ifmeorg/ifme/commit/014f6d3526a594109d4d6607c2f30b1865e37611"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/vulnerability-database/CVE-2021-25992"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…