GHSA-XH5J-XJFQ-QVVX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-29 22:14 – Updated: 2026-05-29 22:14
VLAI
Summary
stigmem-node's federation peer token timestamp validation may reject valid peer tokens
Details
Impact
A mismatch in federation peer-token timestamp handling could cause valid peer tokens to be treated as expired. Impacted deployments are Stigmem nodes using federation peer authentication paths from affected versions. The primary impact is availability and reliability of authenticated federation flows.
Patches
Patched in 0.9.0a2. Federation peer-token timestamp handling now uses the canonical millisecond-based validation path and is covered by regression tests.
Workarounds
Before upgrading, avoid mixed peer-token minting paths and restrict federation use to tightly controlled peers.
Upgrade
Upgrade to the patched release:
pip install --upgrade --pre stigmem-node
If developers install through the Stigmem meta-package instead, they should use the matching extra for deployments, for example:
pip install --upgrade --pre 'stigmem[node]'
Resources
- Release: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/releases/tag/v0.9.0a2
- Changelog: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/CHANGELOG.md#L14-L35
- Security policy and posture: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/SECURITY.md
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "stigmem-node"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.0a2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-345"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-29T22:14:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nA mismatch in federation peer-token timestamp handling could cause valid peer tokens to be treated as expired. Impacted deployments are Stigmem nodes using federation peer authentication paths from affected versions. The primary impact is availability and reliability of authenticated federation flows.\n\n### Patches\nPatched in 0.9.0a2. Federation peer-token timestamp handling now uses the canonical millisecond-based validation path and is covered by regression tests.\n\n### Workarounds\nBefore upgrading, avoid mixed peer-token minting paths and restrict federation use to tightly controlled peers.\n\n### Upgrade\nUpgrade to the patched release:\n\n```bash\npip install --upgrade --pre stigmem-node\n```\n\nIf developers install through the Stigmem meta-package instead, they should use the matching extra for deployments, for example:\n\n```bash\npip install --upgrade --pre \u0027stigmem[node]\u0027\n```\n\n### Resources\n- Release: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/releases/tag/v0.9.0a2\n- Changelog: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/CHANGELOG.md#L14-L35\n- Security policy and posture: https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/SECURITY.md",
"id": "GHSA-xh5j-xjfq-qvvx",
"modified": "2026-05-29T22:14:34Z",
"published": "2026-05-29T22:14:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/security/advisories/GHSA-xh5j-xjfq-qvvx"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/CHANGELOG.md#L14-L35"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/SECURITY.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/releases/tag/v0.9.0a2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "stigmem-node\u0027s federation peer token timestamp validation may reject valid peer tokens"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…