GHSA-XG88-J2C7-G852

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

greybus: raw: fix use-after-free if write is called after disconnect

If a user writes to the chardev after disconnect has been called, the kernel panics with the following trace (with CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y):

    BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000218
     ...
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     gb_operation_create_common+0x61/0x180
     gb_operation_create_flags+0x28/0xa0
     gb_operation_sync_timeout+0x6f/0x100
     raw_write+0x7b/0xc7 [gb_raw]
     vfs_write+0xcf/0x420
     ? task_mm_cid_work+0x136/0x220
     ksys_write+0x63/0xe0
     do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x290
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Disconnect calls gb_connection_destroy, which ends up freeing the connection object. When gb_operation_sync is called in the write file operations, its gets a freed connection as parameter and the kernel panics.

The gb_connection_destroy cannot be moved out of the disconnect function, as the Greybus subsystem expect all connections belonging to a bundle to be destroyed when disconnect returns.

To prevent this bug, use a rw lock to synchronize access between write and disconnect. This guarantees that the write function doesn't try to use a disconnected connection.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53024"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngreybus: raw: fix use-after-free if write is called after disconnect\n\nIf a user writes to the chardev after disconnect has been called, the\nkernel panics with the following trace (with\nCONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y):\n\n        BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000218\n         ...\n        Call Trace:\n         \u003cTASK\u003e\n         gb_operation_create_common+0x61/0x180\n         gb_operation_create_flags+0x28/0xa0\n         gb_operation_sync_timeout+0x6f/0x100\n         raw_write+0x7b/0xc7 [gb_raw]\n         vfs_write+0xcf/0x420\n         ? task_mm_cid_work+0x136/0x220\n         ksys_write+0x63/0xe0\n         do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x290\n         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nDisconnect calls gb_connection_destroy, which ends up freeing the\nconnection object. When gb_operation_sync is called in the write file\noperations, its gets a freed connection as parameter and the kernel\npanics.\n\nThe gb_connection_destroy cannot be moved out of the disconnect\nfunction, as the Greybus subsystem expect all connections belonging to a\nbundle to be destroyed when disconnect returns.\n\nTo prevent this bug, use a rw lock to synchronize access between write\nand disconnect. This guarantees that the write function doesn\u0027t try\nto use a disconnected connection.",
  "id": "GHSA-xg88-j2c7-g852",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:39Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53024"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48d6c32bc049abd114e8f0836c0e7d7cbfba7827"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84265cbd96b97058ef67e3f8be3933667a000835"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…