GHSA-X9JF-G794-6PC5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:32 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:32
VLAI
Details
HP USB 2.0 Floppy Drive Key product options (1) 442084-B21 and (2) 442085-B21 for certain HP ProLiant servers contain the (a) W32.Fakerecy and (b) W32.SillyFDC worms, which might be launched if the server does not have up-to-date detection.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-0708"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-06T23:44:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "HP USB 2.0 Floppy Drive Key product options (1) 442084-B21 and (2) 442085-B21 for certain HP ProLiant servers contain the (a) W32.Fakerecy and (b) W32.SillyFDC worms, which might be launched if the server does not have up-to-date detection.",
"id": "GHSA-x9jf-g794-6pc5",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:32:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:32:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0708"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=120732648630458\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1019785"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…