GHSA-X6RF-V7RX-4H25
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:43 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:43
VLAI
Details
RSA Authentication Client 2.0.x, 3.0, and 3.5.x before 3.5.3 does not properly handle a SENSITIVE or NON-EXTRACTABLE tag on a secret key object that is stored on a SecurID 800 authenticator, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and read keys via unspecified PKCS#11 API requests.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3321"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-10-07T21:00:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "RSA Authentication Client 2.0.x, 3.0, and 3.5.x before 3.5.3 does not properly handle a SENSITIVE or NON-EXTRACTABLE tag on a secret key object that is stored on a SecurID 800 authenticator, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and read keys via unspecified PKCS#11 API requests.",
"id": "GHSA-x6rf-v7rx-4h25",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:43:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:43:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/514153/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43795"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…