GHSA-X65W-RC3C-C7R6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:05 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:05
VLAI
Details
Cisco IOS 12.2T through 12.4 allows remote attackers to bypass Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) RADIUS authentication, if the fallback method is set to none, via a long username.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2105"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-07-05T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cisco IOS 12.2T through 12.4 allows remote attackers to bypass Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) RADIUS authentication, if the fallback method is set to none, via a long username.",
"id": "GHSA-x65w-rc3c-c7r6",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:05:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:05:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2105"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/21190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5756"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050629-aaa.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2005/Jun/1014330.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…