GHSA-X4VH-J75G-268G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-02 19:53 – Updated: 2026-03-02 19:53
VLAI?
Summary
NocoDB's Refresh Tokens Not Revoked on Password Reset
Details

Summary

The password reset flow did not revoke existing refresh tokens, allowing an attacker with a previously stolen refresh token to continue minting valid JWTs after the victim resets their password.

Details

passwordReset() in users.service.ts updated token_version (invalidating JWTs) but did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(). The refreshToken() method only checked token existence, not token_version. Both passwordChange() and signOut() correctly deleted all refresh tokens.

Impact

An attacker who previously obtained a refresh token retains access after password reset until the token expires.

Credit

This issue was reported by @bugbunny-research (bugbunny.ai).

Severity ?
4.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.301.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nocodb"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.301.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-28396"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-613"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-02T19:53:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-02T17:16:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe password reset flow did not revoke existing refresh tokens, allowing an attacker with a previously stolen refresh token to continue minting valid JWTs after the victim resets their password.\n\n### Details\n`passwordReset()` in `users.service.ts` updated `token_version` (invalidating JWTs) but did not call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken()`. The `refreshToken()` method only checked token existence, not `token_version`. Both `passwordChange()` and `signOut()` correctly deleted all refresh tokens.\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker who previously obtained a refresh token retains access after password reset until the token expires.\n\n### Credit\nThis issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.com/bugbunny-research) (bugbunny.ai).",
  "id": "GHSA-x4vh-j75g-268g",
  "modified": "2026-03-02T19:53:17Z",
  "published": "2026-03-02T19:53:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-x4vh-j75g-268g"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28396"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/releases/tag/0.301.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "NocoDB\u0027s Refresh Tokens Not Revoked on Password Reset"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.