GHSA-X288-7JX3-2597
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-11 09:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: amlogic: spifc-a4: Fix DMA mapping error handling
Fix three bugs in aml_sfc_dma_buffer_setup() error paths: 1. Unnecessary goto: When the first DMA mapping (sfc->daddr) fails, nothing needs cleanup. Use direct return instead of goto. 2. Double-unmap bug: When info DMA mapping failed, the code would unmap sfc->daddr inline, then fall through to out_map_data which would unmap it again, causing a double-unmap. 3. Wrong unmap size: The out_map_info label used datalen instead of infolen when unmapping sfc->iaddr, which could lead to incorrect DMA sync behavior.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43461"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T15:16:58Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspi: amlogic: spifc-a4: Fix DMA mapping error handling\n\nFix three bugs in aml_sfc_dma_buffer_setup() error paths:\n1. Unnecessary goto: When the first DMA mapping (sfc-\u003edaddr) fails,\n nothing needs cleanup. Use direct return instead of goto.\n2. Double-unmap bug: When info DMA mapping failed, the code would\n unmap sfc-\u003edaddr inline, then fall through to out_map_data which\n would unmap it again, causing a double-unmap.\n3. Wrong unmap size: The out_map_info label used datalen instead of\n infolen when unmapping sfc-\u003eiaddr, which could lead to incorrect\n DMA sync behavior.",
"id": "GHSA-x288-7jx3-2597",
"modified": "2026-05-11T09:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T15:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43461"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a83d6c9e149a176340190fa9cbadf2266db4c9a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b20b437666e1cb26a7c499d1664e8f2a0ac67000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0b88f1176074f80140ed77fce909f254b7180ab"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…