GHSA-X288-7JX3-2597

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-11 09:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

spi: amlogic: spifc-a4: Fix DMA mapping error handling

Fix three bugs in aml_sfc_dma_buffer_setup() error paths: 1. Unnecessary goto: When the first DMA mapping (sfc->daddr) fails, nothing needs cleanup. Use direct return instead of goto. 2. Double-unmap bug: When info DMA mapping failed, the code would unmap sfc->daddr inline, then fall through to out_map_data which would unmap it again, causing a double-unmap. 3. Wrong unmap size: The out_map_info label used datalen instead of infolen when unmapping sfc->iaddr, which could lead to incorrect DMA sync behavior.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43461"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T15:16:58Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspi: amlogic: spifc-a4: Fix DMA mapping error handling\n\nFix three bugs in aml_sfc_dma_buffer_setup() error paths:\n1. Unnecessary goto: When the first DMA mapping (sfc-\u003edaddr) fails,\n   nothing needs cleanup. Use direct return instead of goto.\n2. Double-unmap bug: When info DMA mapping failed, the code would\n   unmap sfc-\u003edaddr inline, then fall through to out_map_data which\n   would unmap it again, causing a double-unmap.\n3. Wrong unmap size: The out_map_info label used datalen instead of\n   infolen when unmapping sfc-\u003eiaddr, which could lead to incorrect\n   DMA sync behavior.",
  "id": "GHSA-x288-7jx3-2597",
  "modified": "2026-05-11T09:30:31Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T15:31:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43461"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a83d6c9e149a176340190fa9cbadf2266db4c9a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b20b437666e1cb26a7c499d1664e8f2a0ac67000"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0b88f1176074f80140ed77fce909f254b7180ab"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…