GHSA-WW7H-MCJR-5643

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-04 09:30 – Updated: 2026-01-27 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: let smbd_destroy() call disable_work_sync(&info->post_send_credits_work)

In smbd_destroy() we may destroy the memory so we better wait until post_send_credits_work is no longer pending and will never be started again.

I actually just hit the case using rxe:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 138 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1032 rxe_post_recv+0x1ee/0x480 [rdma_rxe] ... [ 5305.686979] [ T138] smbd_post_recv+0x445/0xc10 [cifs] [ 5305.687135] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687149] [ T138] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [ 5305.687185] [ T138] ? __pfx_smbd_post_recv+0x10/0x10 [cifs] [ 5305.687329] [ T138] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687356] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687368] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687378] [ T138] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x60 [ 5305.687389] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687399] [ T138] ? get_receive_buffer+0x168/0x210 [cifs] [ 5305.687555] [ T138] smbd_post_send_credits+0x382/0x4b0 [cifs] [ 5305.687701] [ T138] ? __pfx_smbd_post_send_credits+0x10/0x10 [cifs] [ 5305.687855] [ T138] ? __pfxschedule+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687865] [ T138] ? _pfxraw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687875] [ T138] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x8e/0xa0 [ 5305.687889] [ T138] process_one_work+0x629/0xf80 [ 5305.687908] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687917] [ T138] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [ 5305.687933] [ T138] worker_thread+0x87f/0x1570 ...

It means rxe_post_recv was called after rdma_destroy_qp(). This happened because put_receive_buffer() was triggered by ib_drain_qp() and called: queue_work(info->workqueue, &info->post_send_credits_work);

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-39932"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-04T08:15:45Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: let smbd_destroy() call disable_work_sync(\u0026info-\u003epost_send_credits_work)\n\nIn smbd_destroy() we may destroy the memory so we better\nwait until post_send_credits_work is no longer pending\nand will never be started again.\n\nI actually just hit the case using rxe:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 138 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1032 rxe_post_recv+0x1ee/0x480 [rdma_rxe]\n...\n[ 5305.686979] [    T138]  smbd_post_recv+0x445/0xc10 [cifs]\n[ 5305.687135] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5\n[ 5305.687149] [    T138]  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30\n[ 5305.687185] [    T138]  ? __pfx_smbd_post_recv+0x10/0x10 [cifs]\n[ 5305.687329] [    T138]  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10\n[ 5305.687356] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5\n[ 5305.687368] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5\n[ 5305.687378] [    T138]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x60\n[ 5305.687389] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5\n[ 5305.687399] [    T138]  ? get_receive_buffer+0x168/0x210 [cifs]\n[ 5305.687555] [    T138]  smbd_post_send_credits+0x382/0x4b0 [cifs]\n[ 5305.687701] [    T138]  ? __pfx_smbd_post_send_credits+0x10/0x10 [cifs]\n[ 5305.687855] [    T138]  ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10\n[ 5305.687865] [    T138]  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10\n[ 5305.687875] [    T138]  ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x8e/0xa0\n[ 5305.687889] [    T138]  process_one_work+0x629/0xf80\n[ 5305.687908] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5\n[ 5305.687917] [    T138]  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30\n[ 5305.687933] [    T138]  worker_thread+0x87f/0x1570\n...\n\nIt means rxe_post_recv was called after rdma_destroy_qp().\nThis happened because put_receive_buffer() was triggered\nby ib_drain_qp() and called:\nqueue_work(info-\u003eworkqueue, \u0026info-\u003epost_send_credits_work);",
  "id": "GHSA-ww7h-mcjr-5643",
  "modified": "2026-01-27T21:31:35Z",
  "published": "2025-10-04T09:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39932"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fabb1236f2e3ad78d531be0a4ad9f4a4ccdda87"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ae90a2baf923e85eb037b636aa641250bf4220f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9dcbbcf9145b68aa85c40947311a6907277e097"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…