GHSA-WW4G-J47R-8Q39

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-06 09:30 – Updated: 2026-08-08 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fuse-uring: fix data races on ring->ready

On weakly-ordered architectures, the store to fiq->ops can be reordered past the store to ring->ready, allowing a CPU that sees ring->ready == true via fuse_uring_ready() to dispatch requests through a stale fiq->ops pointer. Upgrade the store to smp_store_release() and the load in fuse_uring_ready() to smp_load_acquire() so that the preceding WRITE_ONCE(fiq->ops, ...) is visible to any CPU that observes ring->ready == true.

Additionally, fuse_uring_do_register() publishes ring->ready with WRITE_ONCE() but the fast-path check reads it with a plain load. This is a marked-vs-unmarked access that KCSAN will flag. Wrap it in READ_ONCE() to mark it without adding unnecessary ordering.

Also wrap the fc->ring load in fuse_uring_ready() in READ_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from reloading it between the NULL check and the dereference.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64588"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-06T08:16:34Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfuse-uring: fix data races on ring-\u003eready\n\nOn weakly-ordered architectures, the store to fiq-\u003eops can be\nreordered past the store to ring-\u003eready, allowing a CPU that sees\nring-\u003eready == true via fuse_uring_ready() to dispatch requests\nthrough a stale fiq-\u003eops pointer. Upgrade the store to\nsmp_store_release() and the load in fuse_uring_ready() to\nsmp_load_acquire() so that the preceding WRITE_ONCE(fiq-\u003eops, ...)\nis visible to any CPU that observes ring-\u003eready == true.\n\nAdditionally, fuse_uring_do_register() publishes ring-\u003eready with\nWRITE_ONCE() but the fast-path check reads it with a plain load.\nThis is a marked-vs-unmarked access that KCSAN will flag. Wrap it in\nREAD_ONCE() to mark it without adding unnecessary ordering.\n\nAlso wrap the fc-\u003ering load in fuse_uring_ready() in READ_ONCE() to\nprevent the compiler from reloading it between the NULL check and the\ndereference.",
  "id": "GHSA-ww4g-j47r-8q39",
  "modified": "2026-08-08T15:30:25Z",
  "published": "2026-08-06T09:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46725a0056c884cf58a6897f222892807327d82d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b156bb9966972122b148acab8bdf415cdb8176a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d01a09b442cb786cd44ccc7c84d57e2856d6737c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.