GHSA-WVH4-6WWM-47C4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:59 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:59SalesLogix 6.1 does not verify if a user is authenticated before performing sensitive operations, which could allow remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary SLX commands on the server or spoof the server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, or (2) obtain the database password via a GetConnection request to TCP port 1707.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-1611"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2004-10-18T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "SalesLogix 6.1 does not verify if a user is authenticated before performing sensitive operations, which could allow remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary SLX commands on the server or spoof the server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, or (2) obtain the database password via a GetConnection request to TCP port 1707.",
"id": "GHSA-wvh4-6wwm-47c4",
"modified": "2022-04-29T02:59:53Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T02:59:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1611"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17754"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-10/0661.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=109811852218478\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12883"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/10947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/10948"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11450"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.