GHSA-WPHV-P3GW-H29J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-03 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset

Once in a blue moon, the mptcp receive path can recursively call mptcp_data_ready() via state change under unlucky error conditions, and then try to hold the data lock again.

Break the recursion loop explicitly checking for the exceptional condition.

Add a new flag instead of using an existing one like 'closing', to exit early in subflow_state_change(), and explicitly flush the RX queue at reset time.

This avoids unneeded processing to check for available data -- calling get_mapping_status() and more on a dying subflow -- but also in error reporting and worker scheduling.

Note that we must consume the currently peeked skb before invoking mptcp_dss_corruption to avoid consuming it again after the eventual reset has freed it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-97524"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset\n\nOnce in a blue moon, the mptcp receive path can recursively call\nmptcp_data_ready() via state change under unlucky error conditions, and\nthen try to hold the data lock again.\n\nBreak the recursion loop explicitly checking for the exceptional\ncondition.\n\nAdd a new flag instead of using an existing one like \u0027closing\u0027, to exit\nearly in subflow_state_change(), and explicitly flush the RX queue at\nreset time.\n\nThis avoids unneeded processing to check for available data -- calling\nget_mapping_status() and more on a dying subflow -- but also in error\nreporting and worker scheduling.\n\nNote that we must consume the currently peeked skb before invoking\nmptcp_dss_corruption to avoid consuming it again after the eventual\nreset has freed it.",
  "id": "GHSA-wphv-p3gw-h29j",
  "modified": "2026-10-03T12:31:15Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T12:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97524"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1962841387087970d75ba8b8d4c2aa2d45705e50"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b0f561f21b27c40c91ea4975268a06092bd7e9c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b7abdcb5ba832fafab679f0d998af39cbc99307"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d669c740933124eae3df8cfc15995af9bcc6aba"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83a7dcdd2b1060484528da70a643125174d47e5a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a370e56024df0b07e3120c45a9773ae123819fd6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2dbcc1ed48b5ac070a41db4a52aade6823c4df0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce7e4ede01ed3e47a48c0f1ce1d87bf4864bee9f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.