GHSA-WP75-7GQM-J93M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-27 15:33 – Updated: 2026-05-27 15:33In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
power: supply: ab8500: Fix use-after-free in power_supply_changed()
Using the devm_ variant for requesting IRQ before the devm_
variant for allocating/registering the power_supply handle, means that
the power_supply handle will be deallocated/unregistered before the
interrupt handler (since devm_ naturally deallocates in reverse
allocation order). This means that during removal, there is a race
condition where an interrupt can fire just after the power_supply
handle has been freed, but just before the corresponding
unregistration of the IRQ handler has run.
This will lead to the IRQ handler calling power_supply_changed() with
a freed power_supply handle. Which usually crashes the system or
otherwise silently corrupts the memory...
Note that there is a similar situation which can also happen during
probe(); the possibility of an interrupt firing before registering
the power_supply handle. This would then lead to the nasty situation
of using the power_supply handle uninitialized in
power_supply_changed().
Commit 1c1f13a006ed ("power: supply: ab8500: Move to componentized
binding") introduced this issue during a refactorization. Fix this racy
use-after-free by making sure the IRQ is requested after the
registration of the power_supply handle.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45946"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T14:17:10Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npower: supply: ab8500: Fix use-after-free in power_supply_changed()\n\nUsing the `devm_` variant for requesting IRQ _before_ the `devm_`\nvariant for allocating/registering the `power_supply` handle, means that\nthe `power_supply` handle will be deallocated/unregistered _before_ the\ninterrupt handler (since `devm_` naturally deallocates in reverse\nallocation order). This means that during removal, there is a race\ncondition where an interrupt can fire just _after_ the `power_supply`\nhandle has been freed, *but* just _before_ the corresponding\nunregistration of the IRQ handler has run.\n\nThis will lead to the IRQ handler calling `power_supply_changed()` with\na freed `power_supply` handle. Which usually crashes the system or\notherwise silently corrupts the memory...\n\nNote that there is a similar situation which can also happen during\n`probe()`; the possibility of an interrupt firing _before_ registering\nthe `power_supply` handle. This would then lead to the nasty situation\nof using the `power_supply` handle *uninitialized* in\n`power_supply_changed()`.\n\nCommit 1c1f13a006ed (\"power: supply: ab8500: Move to componentized\nbinding\") introduced this issue during a refactorization. Fix this racy\nuse-after-free by making sure the IRQ is requested _after_ the\nregistration of the `power_supply` handle.",
"id": "GHSA-wp75-7gqm-j93m",
"modified": "2026-05-27T15:33:17Z",
"published": "2026-05-27T15:33:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43cbb78ee047b9b12d096d40e3be265969d4c1f8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46dbda27b028d78087667e8280966b99cec015ca"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/551672981fe227122258a25a385a05f5c0746ad6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/709db4b476e254579d9c48ec34d397a41ca0c407"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/847eeb6c0efcd76c7def73857cf798a4fcd8f79b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4af8a98bb52825a5331ae1d0604c0ea6956ba4b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f50433f2603def08b21a4bf2fd238687fb5cbde9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.