GHSA-WGVJ-5XCQ-RQWR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:25 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:25
VLAI?
Details
Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Dayfox Designs Dayfox Blog 2.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the slogin parameter in the (1) adminlog.php, (2) postblog.php, (3) index.php, or (4) index2.php script in /edit.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-5183"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-10-10T04:06:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Dayfox Designs Dayfox Blog 2.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the slogin parameter in the (1) adminlog.php, (2) postblog.php, (3) index.php, or (4) index2.php script in /edit.",
"id": "GHSA-wgvj-5xcq-rqwr",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:25:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:25:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5183"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1694"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/447500/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…