GHSA-WFQX-5V3G-MPCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-26 15:34 – Updated: 2026-10-26 15:34In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm-integrity: fix buffer overflow in inline mode with large tag size
In inline mode, dm_integrity_check and dm_integrity_inline_recheck compute the checksum of each block into an on-stack buffer of HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE bytes. integrity_sector_checksum pads its result with zeroes up to the tag size, so if the tag size is larger than HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE, the padding runs past the end of the buffer. With CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR the kernel panics in dm_integrity_check on the first read.
Enlarge both buffers to hold MAX_TAG_SIZE bytes, as commit b93b6643e9b5 ("dm integrity: fix a crash with unusually large tag size") did for integrity_metadata.
Note that this is not a security bug because the buffer overflow can only be triggered by root.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-99098"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-26T15:16:48Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndm-integrity: fix buffer overflow in inline mode with large tag size\n\nIn inline mode, dm_integrity_check and dm_integrity_inline_recheck\ncompute the checksum of each block into an on-stack buffer of\nHASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE bytes. integrity_sector_checksum pads its result\nwith zeroes up to the tag size, so if the tag size is larger than\nHASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE, the padding runs past the end of the buffer. With\nCONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR the kernel panics in dm_integrity_check on the\nfirst read.\n\nEnlarge both buffers to hold MAX_TAG_SIZE bytes, as commit b93b6643e9b5\n(\"dm integrity: fix a crash with unusually large tag size\") did for\nintegrity_metadata.\n\nNote that this is not a security bug because the buffer overflow can only\nbe triggered by root.",
"id": "GHSA-wfqx-5v3g-mpcg",
"modified": "2026-10-26T15:34:50Z",
"published": "2026-10-26T15:34:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99098"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c7aad85aeb9e28386672e3a009aa2e61f751b86"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f0ee735dc68e3e6c4dd9a666d7f7047163c4165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/764b683a6180fd72c931c13fea98d383506a3475"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f49cd7820cd0a96f20e1aa2708adb002124e38a7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.