GHSA-WFFX-7972-VW67

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-10-30 15:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: bound smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE walks by DACL size

smb_check_perm_dacl() validates that the DACL fits inside the NT security descriptor, but then bounds its two ACE walks by the remaining NTSD length (acl_size) rather than the DACL's declared size (pdacl_size).

When pdacl->size is smaller than the trailing NTSD buffer, bytes after the declared DACL boundary - still inside the stored security descriptor - are parsed as ACEs during access checks. A crafted DACL can place an access-granting ACE beyond pdacl->size, and the current code accepts it during SMB2_CREATE access validation, while parse_dacl() and smb_inherit_dacl() stop at pdacl_size.

Bound both ACE walks by pdacl_size to match the DACL boundary semantics used elsewhere in the server.

Validation: - semantic KUnit harness shows the post-boundary ACE is selected before the fix and rejected (EACCES) after it - linux master (7.2-rc6), x86_64

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90153"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: bound smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE walks by DACL size\n\nsmb_check_perm_dacl() validates that the DACL fits inside the NT\nsecurity descriptor, but then bounds its two ACE walks by the\nremaining NTSD length (acl_size) rather than the DACL\u0027s declared\nsize (pdacl_size).\n\nWhen pdacl-\u003esize is smaller than the trailing NTSD buffer, bytes\nafter the declared DACL boundary - still inside the stored security\ndescriptor - are parsed as ACEs during access checks.  A crafted\nDACL can place an access-granting ACE beyond pdacl-\u003esize, and the\ncurrent code accepts it during SMB2_CREATE access validation, while\nparse_dacl() and smb_inherit_dacl() stop at pdacl_size.\n\nBound both ACE walks by pdacl_size to match the DACL boundary\nsemantics used elsewhere in the server.\n\nValidation:\n- semantic KUnit harness shows the post-boundary ACE is selected\n  before the fix and rejected (EACCES) after it\n- linux master (7.2-rc6), x86_64",
  "id": "GHSA-wffx-7972-vw67",
  "modified": "2026-10-30T15:33:33Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:31:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90153"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79decd88dd3f0d42e7fb0689b1a7853bfa302459"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e4f75e979c1d9a51b0a48ac33d0cfd5f039ec67"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/930dcdd888eabf166589e020dcbf6d15b5e13305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2051ffe452afad52f580b85a3fd8851933b1e7c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a29f57a14c939586d84d7fd6a029bd1fd170098f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4a307d149327dad5fb25187e1b03cebd1b04de6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.