GHSA-WC4V-22M8-HJ35

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf tools: Use perf_env__get_cpu_topology() in machine__resolve()

machine__resolve() accesses env->cpu[al->cpu].socket_id after checking al->cpu >= 0 and env->cpu != NULL, but without validating al->cpu against env->nr_cpus_avail. Since al->cpu comes from the untrusted perf.data sample, a crafted file with a large CPU index causes an out-of-bounds heap read.

Use perf_env__get_cpu_topology() which validates both NULL and bounds. Also bounds-check al->cpu before the cast to struct perf_cpu (int16_t): without this, values like 65536 silently truncate to 0, bypassing the accessor's internal check and returning CPU 0's topology.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80670"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:52Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf tools: Use perf_env__get_cpu_topology() in machine__resolve()\n\nmachine__resolve() accesses env-\u003ecpu[al-\u003ecpu].socket_id after checking\nal-\u003ecpu \u003e= 0 and env-\u003ecpu != NULL, but without validating al-\u003ecpu\nagainst env-\u003enr_cpus_avail.  Since al-\u003ecpu comes from the untrusted\nperf.data sample, a crafted file with a large CPU index causes an\nout-of-bounds heap read.\n\nUse perf_env__get_cpu_topology() which validates both NULL and bounds.\nAlso bounds-check al-\u003ecpu before the cast to struct perf_cpu (int16_t):\nwithout this, values like 65536 silently truncate to 0, bypassing the\naccessor\u0027s internal check and returning CPU 0\u0027s topology.",
  "id": "GHSA-wc4v-22m8-hj35",
  "modified": "2026-08-29T09:30:27Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T09:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80670"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5484b43a0ec8231c36fba6ead654cb72dbba8b8f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9e8406651dcc1c19238aad11861a758683525b4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb266a14c16a93eb4db7b56a452d6be93f8bdcd4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…