GHSA-W8WF-FR39-3C38
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-03 21:32 – Updated: 2026-11-03 21:32The Tapo Cloud MQTT broker contains a broken access control vulnerability in a proxy topic used by authenticated Tapo devices to request service tokens. The broker does not verify that the device ID supplied in a proxy request belongs to the authenticated device. An attacker who owns a Tapo device and knows another device's ID may obtain a device token scoped to the target device and use it to upload attacker-controlled content to the target user's Tapo Cloud storage. The content may then be presented in the Tapo app as a legitimate event.
Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to upload attacker-controlled content that is presented to a target user as a legitimate Tapo event, retrieve internal service information through crafted proxy requests, or abuse Tapo Cloud outbound request capability in activity that could affect service availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-105821"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-03T20:18:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Tapo\nCloud MQTT broker contains a broken access control vulnerability in a proxy\ntopic used by authenticated Tapo devices to request service tokens. The broker\ndoes not verify that the device ID supplied in a proxy request belongs to the\nauthenticated device. An attacker who owns a Tapo device and knows another\ndevice\u0027s ID may obtain a device token scoped to the target device and use it to\nupload attacker-controlled content to the target user\u0027s Tapo Cloud storage. The\ncontent may then be presented in the Tapo app as a legitimate event.\n\n\n\n\n\nSuccessful\nexploitation may allow an attacker to upload attacker-controlled content that\nis presented to a target user as a legitimate Tapo event, retrieve internal\nservice information through crafted proxy requests, or abuse Tapo Cloud\noutbound request capability in activity that could affect service\navailability.",
"id": "GHSA-w8wf-fr39-3c38",
"modified": "2026-11-03T21:32:13Z",
"published": "2026-11-03T21:32:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-105821"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5370"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.