GHSA-W75M-WGP8-WC83
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-18 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-14 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors
Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d
The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-49985"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-18T11:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Don\u0027t use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors\n\nHsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which\nis based on a customized syzkaller:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489\n CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0\n ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0\n kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197\n ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200\n ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0\n bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0\n ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0\n ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70\n bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640\n ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0\n bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220\n ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220\n ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110\n ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180\n ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0\n ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120\n ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180\n __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070\n ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530\n ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600\n ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450\n ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0\n ? fput+0x30/0x1a0\n ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0\n ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70\n do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d\n\nThe problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map-\u003emax_entries - 1) has\nlimited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the\nset of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the\nactual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg-\u003evar_off) check may\nyield true when it shouldn\u0027t, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in\n00XX -\u003e v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here\nrepresented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is\nknown const scalar, really just use the concrete reg-\u003evar_off.value for the\nupper index check.",
"id": "GHSA-w75m-wgp8-wc83",
"modified": "2025-11-14T18:31:23Z",
"published": "2025-06-18T12:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f672112f8665102a5842c170be1713f8ff95919"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a36df92c7ff7ecde2fb362241d0ab024dddd0597"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a657182a5c5150cdfacb6640aad1d2712571a409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8979807178434db8ceaa84dfcd44363e71e50bb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.