GHSA-W635-R3JV-VVC6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:06 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:06
VLAI
Details
Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and restart) via crafted packets to (1) the CTI Manager (ctimgr.exe) or (2) the CallManager (ccm.exe).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2242"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-07-12T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and restart) via crafted packets to (1) the CTI Manager (ctimgr.exe) or (2) the CallManager (ccm.exe).",
"id": "GHSA-w635-r3jv-vvc6",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:06:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:06:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2242"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050712-ccm.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14252"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…