GHSA-VWW8-W2QW-QHFG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-27 15:31 – Updated: 2025-01-08 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/gup: handle NULL pages in unpin_user_pages()

The recent addition of "pofs" (pages or folios) handling to gup has a flaw: it assumes that unpin_user_pages() handles NULL pages in the pages** array. That's not the case, as I discovered when I ran on a new configuration on my test machine.

Fix this by skipping NULL pages in unpin_user_pages(), just like unpin_folios() already does.

Details: when booting on x86 with "numa=fake=2 movablecore=4G" on Linux 6.12, and running this:

tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm

...I get the following crash:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 RIP: 0010:sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0 ... Call Trace: ? __die_body+0x66/0xb0 ? page_fault_oops+0x30c/0x3b0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x6c3/0x720 ? irqentry_enter+0x34/0x60 ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x100 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0 unpin_user_pages+0x24/0xe0 check_and_migrate_movable_pages_or_folios+0x455/0x4b0 __gup_longterm_locked+0x3bf/0x820 ? mmap_read_lock_killable+0x12/0x50 ? __pfx_mmap_read_lock_killable+0x10/0x10 pin_user_pages+0x66/0xa0 gup_test_ioctl+0x358/0xb20 __se_sys_ioctl+0x6b/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-56612"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-27T15:15:20Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/gup: handle NULL pages in unpin_user_pages()\n\nThe recent addition of \"pofs\" (pages or folios) handling to gup has a\nflaw: it assumes that unpin_user_pages() handles NULL pages in the pages**\narray.  That\u0027s not the case, as I discovered when I ran on a new\nconfiguration on my test machine.\n\nFix this by skipping NULL pages in unpin_user_pages(), just like\nunpin_folios() already does.\n\nDetails: when booting on x86 with \"numa=fake=2 movablecore=4G\" on Linux\n6.12, and running this:\n\n    tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm\n\n...I get the following crash:\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\nRIP: 0010:sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die_body+0x66/0xb0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x30c/0x3b0\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x6c3/0x720\n ? irqentry_enter+0x34/0x60\n ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x100\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0\n unpin_user_pages+0x24/0xe0\n check_and_migrate_movable_pages_or_folios+0x455/0x4b0\n __gup_longterm_locked+0x3bf/0x820\n ? mmap_read_lock_killable+0x12/0x50\n ? __pfx_mmap_read_lock_killable+0x10/0x10\n pin_user_pages+0x66/0xa0\n gup_test_ioctl+0x358/0xb20\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x6b/0xc0\n do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e",
  "id": "GHSA-vww8-w2qw-qhfg",
  "modified": "2025-01-08T18:30:47Z",
  "published": "2024-12-27T15:31:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56612"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69d319450d1c651f3b05cd820ff285fdd810c032"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1268be280d8e484ab3606d7476edd0f14bb9961"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…