GHSA-VW3W-FR62-Q869

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:07 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:07
VLAI
Details

Mozilla Firefox 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 does not choose the challenge with the strongest authentication scheme available as required by RFC2617, which might cause credentials to be sent in plaintext even if an encrypted channel is available.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2395"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-07-27T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Mozilla Firefox 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 does not choose the challenge with the strongest authentication scheme available as required by RFC2617, which might cause credentials to be sent in plaintext even if an encrypted channel is available.",
  "id": "GHSA-vw3w-fr62-q869",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:07:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:07:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281851"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22272"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5PP0L00GUQ.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/405666"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14325"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…