GHSA-VVQQ-WPW3-6RVM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-18 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm-integrity: fix buffer overflow with keyed discard

Since commit 68c5c42567bc ("dm-integrity: replace forgeable discard filler with a keyed sector marker"), integrity_metadata computes a checksum for every discarded block into the "checksums" buffer. integrity_sector_checksum always writes the whole digest. So if the tag size is smaller than the digest size, the checksum of the last block that fits into the buffer is written past the end of it. For example, with hmac(sha256) and tag size 16, a 4MiB discard writes 16 bytes past the kmalloc'ed page.

Fix this by subtracting extra_space from the buffer size when computing max_blocks, like we do for writes.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90052"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:16:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndm-integrity: fix buffer overflow with keyed discard\n\nSince commit 68c5c42567bc (\"dm-integrity: replace forgeable discard\nfiller with a keyed sector marker\"), integrity_metadata computes a\nchecksum for every discarded block into the \"checksums\" buffer.\nintegrity_sector_checksum always writes the whole digest. So if the tag\nsize is smaller than the digest size, the checksum of the last block\nthat fits into the buffer is written past the end of it. For example,\nwith hmac(sha256) and tag size 16, a 4MiB discard writes 16 bytes past\nthe kmalloc\u0027ed page.\n\nFix this by subtracting extra_space from the buffer size when computing\nmax_blocks, like we do for writes.",
  "id": "GHSA-vvqq-wpw3-6rvm",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T18:31:24Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90052"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59e6f919d77d72ec79cbf171256f2f7819737580"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9988c1c9e0d1c78391e3d8e2817beb667470c76f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd08a645195f410f2dcaa40de379a45ce110e873"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…