GHSA-VPJP-GFPQ-57C9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 18:31 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:36
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/xe/uapi: Reject coh_none PAT index for CPU cached memory in madvise

Add validation in xe_vm_madvise_ioctl() to reject PAT indices with XE_COH_NONE coherency mode when applied to CPU cached memory.

Using coh_none with CPU cached buffers is a security issue. When the kernel clears pages before reallocation, the clear operation stays in CPU cache (dirty). GPU with coh_none can bypass CPU caches and read stale sensitive data directly from DRAM, potentially leaking data from previously freed pages of other processes.

This aligns with the existing validation in vm_bind path (xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo).

v2(Matthew brost) - Add fixes - Move one debug print to better place

v3(Matthew Auld) - Should be drm/xe/uapi - More Cc

v4(Shuicheng Lin) - Fix kmem leak issues by the way

v5 - Remove kmem leak because it has been merged by another patch

v6 - Remove the fix which is not related to current fix

v7 - No change

v8 - Rebase

v9 - Limit the restrictions to iGPU

v10 - No change

(cherry picked from commit 016ccdb674b8c899940b3944952c96a6a490d10a)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46309"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-401",
      "CWE-524"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T17:16:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/xe/uapi: Reject coh_none PAT index for CPU cached memory in madvise\n\nAdd validation in xe_vm_madvise_ioctl() to reject PAT indices with\nXE_COH_NONE coherency mode when applied to CPU cached memory.\n\nUsing coh_none with CPU cached buffers is a security issue. When the\nkernel clears pages before reallocation, the clear operation stays in\nCPU cache (dirty). GPU with coh_none can bypass CPU caches and read\nstale sensitive data directly from DRAM, potentially leaking data from\npreviously freed pages of other processes.\n\nThis aligns with the existing validation in vm_bind path\n(xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo).\n\nv2(Matthew brost)\n- Add fixes\n- Move one debug print to better place\n\nv3(Matthew Auld)\n- Should be drm/xe/uapi\n- More Cc\n\nv4(Shuicheng Lin)\n- Fix kmem leak issues by the way\n\nv5\n- Remove kmem leak because it has been merged by another patch\n\nv6\n- Remove the fix which is not related to current fix\n\nv7\n- No change\n\nv8\n- Rebase\n\nv9\n- Limit the restrictions to iGPU\n\nv10\n- No change\n\n(cherry picked from commit 016ccdb674b8c899940b3944952c96a6a490d10a)",
  "id": "GHSA-vpjp-gfpq-57c9",
  "modified": "2026-06-30T03:36:57Z",
  "published": "2026-06-08T18:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46309"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46309"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2486468"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e5591c2fc1b30f4ea5e2eab4c3a695acc404e39"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87f9b1528e1ffc1da3615d552c9a06aba5e20b00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fea04cf6f2345bc50f15b6638906c35962b89424"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-46309.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.