GHSA-VPJP-GFPQ-57C9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 18:31 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:36In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/xe/uapi: Reject coh_none PAT index for CPU cached memory in madvise
Add validation in xe_vm_madvise_ioctl() to reject PAT indices with XE_COH_NONE coherency mode when applied to CPU cached memory.
Using coh_none with CPU cached buffers is a security issue. When the kernel clears pages before reallocation, the clear operation stays in CPU cache (dirty). GPU with coh_none can bypass CPU caches and read stale sensitive data directly from DRAM, potentially leaking data from previously freed pages of other processes.
This aligns with the existing validation in vm_bind path (xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo).
v2(Matthew brost) - Add fixes - Move one debug print to better place
v3(Matthew Auld) - Should be drm/xe/uapi - More Cc
v4(Shuicheng Lin) - Fix kmem leak issues by the way
v5 - Remove kmem leak because it has been merged by another patch
v6 - Remove the fix which is not related to current fix
v7 - No change
v8 - Rebase
v9 - Limit the restrictions to iGPU
v10 - No change
(cherry picked from commit 016ccdb674b8c899940b3944952c96a6a490d10a)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46309"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-401",
"CWE-524"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T17:16:49Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/xe/uapi: Reject coh_none PAT index for CPU cached memory in madvise\n\nAdd validation in xe_vm_madvise_ioctl() to reject PAT indices with\nXE_COH_NONE coherency mode when applied to CPU cached memory.\n\nUsing coh_none with CPU cached buffers is a security issue. When the\nkernel clears pages before reallocation, the clear operation stays in\nCPU cache (dirty). GPU with coh_none can bypass CPU caches and read\nstale sensitive data directly from DRAM, potentially leaking data from\npreviously freed pages of other processes.\n\nThis aligns with the existing validation in vm_bind path\n(xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo).\n\nv2(Matthew brost)\n- Add fixes\n- Move one debug print to better place\n\nv3(Matthew Auld)\n- Should be drm/xe/uapi\n- More Cc\n\nv4(Shuicheng Lin)\n- Fix kmem leak issues by the way\n\nv5\n- Remove kmem leak because it has been merged by another patch\n\nv6\n- Remove the fix which is not related to current fix\n\nv7\n- No change\n\nv8\n- Rebase\n\nv9\n- Limit the restrictions to iGPU\n\nv10\n- No change\n\n(cherry picked from commit 016ccdb674b8c899940b3944952c96a6a490d10a)",
"id": "GHSA-vpjp-gfpq-57c9",
"modified": "2026-06-30T03:36:57Z",
"published": "2026-06-08T18:31:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2486468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e5591c2fc1b30f4ea5e2eab4c3a695acc404e39"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87f9b1528e1ffc1da3615d552c9a06aba5e20b00"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fea04cf6f2345bc50f15b6638906c35962b89424"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-46309.json"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.