GHSA-VM74-3MF5-J459
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-18 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-18 18:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtc: ac100: Fix clock provider use-after-free on probe failure
ac100_rtc_register_clks() registers the RTC-32k clock with clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() and the clock provider with of_clk_add_hw_provider(). Neither is device managed, and both are released only from ac100_rtc_remove(). The driver core does not call remove() when probe() fails: really_probe() reaches probe_failed below the device_remove() call and goes straight to releasing the device's managed resources.
ac100_rtc_probe() ends with
return devm_rtc_register_device(chip->rtc);
so if that fails after the clocks have been registered, the provider is left on the global of_clk_providers list holding chip->clk_data, which was allocated with devm_kzalloc() and is freed while probe() unwinds. A later lookup on this device tree node then reads freed memory in of_clk_hw_onecell_get(). Consumers that do exactly that exist in tree: the wifi power sequence nodes on sun8i-a83t-bananapi-m3 and sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus take <&ac100_rtc 1>, and the sun9i-a80 boards route osc32k through <&ac100_rtc 0>. The window is narrow, as devm_rtc_register_device() can only fail with -ENOMEM here, but the provider is left dangling whenever it does.
The RTC-32k clock is leaked on the same path. Since clk_core_lookup() searches a global list that is not scoped per device, __clk_register() rejects the duplicate name with -EEXIST, so the leak also makes a later probe of the same device fail.
The error path that returns -EINVAL when the ADDA 4M parent clock cannot be found leaks the RTC-32k clock in the same way. No provider has been registered at that point, so that one is a leak rather than a use-after-free.
Register both with devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() and devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() so that they are released whenever the device goes away, on a failed probe as well as on unbind. Devres releases in reverse order of acquisition, so the provider is removed before chip->clk_data is freed, and the clkout children are now unregistered before their parent rather than after it. ac100_rtc_unregister_clks() and the remove callback then have nothing left to do and are removed.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98826"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-18T16:17:36Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrtc: ac100: Fix clock provider use-after-free on probe failure\n\nac100_rtc_register_clks() registers the RTC-32k clock with\nclk_hw_register_fixed_rate() and the clock provider with\nof_clk_add_hw_provider(). Neither is device managed, and both are\nreleased only from ac100_rtc_remove(). The driver core does not call\nremove() when probe() fails: really_probe() reaches probe_failed below\nthe device_remove() call and goes straight to releasing the device\u0027s\nmanaged resources.\n\nac100_rtc_probe() ends with\n\n\treturn devm_rtc_register_device(chip-\u003ertc);\n\nso if that fails after the clocks have been registered, the provider is\nleft on the global of_clk_providers list holding chip-\u003eclk_data, which\nwas allocated with devm_kzalloc() and is freed while probe() unwinds. A\nlater lookup on this device tree node then reads freed memory in\nof_clk_hw_onecell_get(). Consumers that do exactly that exist in tree:\nthe wifi power sequence nodes on sun8i-a83t-bananapi-m3 and\nsun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus take \u003c\u0026ac100_rtc 1\u003e, and the sun9i-a80 boards\nroute osc32k through \u003c\u0026ac100_rtc 0\u003e. The window is narrow, as\ndevm_rtc_register_device() can only fail with -ENOMEM here, but the\nprovider is left dangling whenever it does.\n\nThe RTC-32k clock is leaked on the same path. Since clk_core_lookup()\nsearches a global list that is not scoped per device, __clk_register()\nrejects the duplicate name with -EEXIST, so the leak also makes a later\nprobe of the same device fail.\n\nThe error path that returns -EINVAL when the ADDA 4M parent clock cannot\nbe found leaks the RTC-32k clock in the same way. No provider has been\nregistered at that point, so that one is a leak rather than a\nuse-after-free.\n\nRegister both with devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() and\ndevm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() so that they are released whenever the\ndevice goes away, on a failed probe as well as on unbind. Devres\nreleases in reverse order of acquisition, so the provider is removed\nbefore chip-\u003eclk_data is freed, and the clkout children are now\nunregistered before their parent rather than after it.\nac100_rtc_unregister_clks() and the remove callback then have nothing\nleft to do and are removed.",
"id": "GHSA-vm74-3mf5-j459",
"modified": "2026-10-18T18:32:04Z",
"published": "2026-10-18T18:32:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12bcd20d76703ee2baf52224d287b7fea096b12f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55ca60ba336632349f7c4585d22ba74ae355b7ce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cff19ddd7f90c1f572a0f83cfc41de8f8dcbcd8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcf0b58e976e83adf246b014518e49c662b96f5e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.