GHSA-VJ36-J2J5-PFW8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:31 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:31
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Video Surveillance 2421 and 2500 series cameras with software 1.1.x and 2.x before 2.4.0 and Video Surveillance 2600 series cameras with software before 4.2.0-13 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending crafted RTSP packets over TCP, aka Bug IDs CSCtj96312, CSCtj39462, and CSCtl80175.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-3318"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-10-27T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Video Surveillance 2421 and 2500 series cameras with software 1.1.x and 2.x before 2.4.0 and Video Surveillance 2600 series cameras with software before 4.2.0-13 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending crafted RTSP packets over TCP, aka Bug IDs CSCtj96312, CSCtj39462, and CSCtl80175.",
  "id": "GHSA-vj36-j2j5-pfw8",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:31:03Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3318"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20111026-camera"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…