GHSA-VH5F-MHCM-54FP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:15 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:15
VLAI?
Details

Gallery 2 before 2.3.2 and 3 before 3.0.3 does not properly implement encryption, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1113.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-2405"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-04-22T18:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Gallery 2 before 2.3.2 and 3 before 3.0.3 does not properly implement encryption, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1113.",
  "id": "GHSA-vh5f-mhcm-54fp",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:15:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:15:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812045"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75201"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://gallery.menalto.com/gallery_3_0_3_and_gallery_2_3_2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…